BKPepe
commented
10 months ago Hi,
Hmm, it might works, but that's not a solution. I will look into it.
Dne čt 19. 10. 2023 17:07 uživatel Jakub Raczynski @.***> napsal:
Maintainer: @BKPepe https://github.com/BKPepe Environment: aarch64, snapshot on 19.10.2023; but issue applies to all versions
Description: There is a problem with syslog-ng package which has its own logread script to read logs. But this package does conflict with core package logd which has its own logread and it is possible to select both of them. Thus, I propose to either add CONFLICTS between syslog-ng and logd package or implement PROVIDES for both of them like @.*** https://github.com/myszsoda/packages/commit/f680a11fafb1b08f63f96eb5fa2030d12bf7f100
I can implement this, but would like to ask opinion which would be preferred.
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/openwrt/packages/issues/22451, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA7IDVFTBLEXVLNRSFFI4RDYAE623AVCNFSM6AAAAAA6HL43BCVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZRHE2TENBZGIYTSOA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>
Rondom
stokito
Maintainer: @BKPepe Environment: aarch64, snapshot on 19.10.2023; but issue applies to all versions
Description: There is a problem with syslog-ng package which has its own logread script to read logs. But this package does conflict with core package logd which has its own logread and it is possible to select both of them. Thus, I propose to either add CONFLICTS between syslog-ng and logd package or implement PROVIDES for both of them like https://github.com/myszsoda/packages/commit/f680a11fafb1b08f63f96eb5fa2030d12bf7f100
I can implement this, but would like to ask opinion which would be preferred.