Open Charrrrrlie opened 2 weeks ago
Hi @Charrrrrlie, welcome to commit your first issue! 你好 @Charrrrrlie,非常欢迎首次提交你的问题!
Besides, I noticed the visualization videos have no joints drawn and the results in 'scene0_associate_keypoints2d.npy' seem in the wrong range (>1e03 while the input image is in (368, 368)).
>>> import numpy as np
>>> data=np.load('scene0_associate_keypoints2d.npy')
>>> data.shape
(2735, 2, 6, 19, 3)
>>> data[0][0][0]
array([[1.11271643e+03, 1.11282910e+03, 7.75416970e-01],
[1.10170972e+03, 8.67035461e+02, 9.00384009e-01],
[1.05169531e+03, 1.11828638e+03, 7.92052984e-01],
[1.17399756e+03, 1.11821265e+03, 7.75319993e-01],
[1.14057812e+03, 7.33562927e+02, 9.68859971e-01],
[1.02350208e+03, 8.67381470e+02, 8.72323990e-01],
[1.18556506e+03, 8.50663574e+02, 8.55180979e-01],
[1.05166663e+03, 1.30793274e+03, 8.65860999e-01],
[1.19631995e+03, 1.30230957e+03, 8.17400992e-01],
[1.05715674e+03, 7.38793030e+02, 9.09249008e-01],
[0.00000000e+00, 0.00000000e+00, 0.00000000e+00],
[9.51032104e+02, 9.95484741e+02, 8.78517985e-01],
[1.27425330e+03, 9.61897583e+02, 9.32591021e-01],
[1.05167896e+03, 1.48639636e+03, 8.70796025e-01],
[1.13518225e+03, 1.44758105e+03, 9.48741019e-01],
[9.67754028e+02, 1.10174255e+03, 8.54382992e-01],
[1.26316687e+03, 1.05713013e+03, 8.08005989e-01],
[1.16292114e+03, 1.52544275e+03, 8.27202976e-01],
[1.05164001e+03, 1.54247791e+03, 8.22476983e-01]])
The results in 'scene0_pred_keypoints3d.npz' seem correct. (And that's why metrics like MPJPE are not very terrible?)
>>> import numpy as np
>>> data = np.load('scene0_pred_keypoints3d.npz')
>>> data.files
['convention', 'keypoints', 'mask']
>>> data['keypoints'].shape
(2735, 2, 19, 4)
>>> data['keypoints'][0,0]
array([[ 0.44035739, 0.81138122, -0.18822792, 1. ],
[ 0.44342533, 1.27131438, -0.13195667, 1. ],
[ 0.32768041, 0.80619949, -0.17555375, 1. ],
[ 0.54508728, 0.81602764, -0.20119405, 1. ],
[ 0.49280715, 1.48571718, 0.00272803, 1. ],
[ 0.29264435, 1.26126456, -0.11988235, 1. ],
[ 0.58975613, 1.28480649, -0.15804569, 1. ],
[ 0.34666932, 0.41698083, -0.11620992, 1. ],
[ 0.58429468, 0.4399837 , -0.11577299, 1. ],
[ 0.35547218, 1.46291053, -0.06224353, 1. ],
[ 0.50029427, 1.4707303 , -0.132844 , 1. ],
[ 0.14133491, 1.03275061, -0.13060124, 1. ],
[ 0.75000304, 1.06469333, -0.20401694, 1. ],
[ 0.34222731, 0.02327326, -0.2378833 , 1. ],
[ 0.5073328 , 0.05773893, -0.29119289, 1. ],
[ 0.17784889, 0.84062225, 0.01113267, 1. ],
[ 0.68762159, 0.92540288, -0.08345005, 1. ],
[ 0.56086171, -0.02101712, -0.14138444, 1. ],
[ 0.34968144, -0.01838641, -0.05645154, 1. ]])
Hello, I am trying to evaluate 4DAG in its benchmark seq2.
I use the following command to execute in the provided docker.
Firstly, I got an error:
It seems to come from the out-of-date config in this line. Therefore I comment it out and the whole process can be executed.
However, there is a gap between the final performance and the reported one in the [readme].(https://github.com/openxrlab/xrmocap/blob/main/configs/fourdag/README.md#fourdag)
The log file is
Do you know what went wrong?
Thank you for your time and attention.