fix: ensure local proxy can handle requests with the same path but with different selector

[windnod]

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

skip the check for the same path list requests, when the localproxy use the canCacheFor() method

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #1963

[sonarcloud[bot]]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarCloud

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 40.00000% with 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 52.41%. Comparing base (c8778fc) to head (6938de3). Report is 55 commits behind head on master.

Files	Patch %	Lines
pkg/yurthub/proxy/remote/loadbalancer.go	0.00%	2 Missing :warning:
pkg/yurthub/proxy/local/local.go	0.00%	0 Missing and 1 partial :warning:

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1964 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 52.41% 52.41% ======================================= Files 173 173 Lines 21015 21015 ======================================= Hits 11014 11014 Misses 9051 9051 Partials 950 950 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openyurtio/openyurt/pull/1964/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openyurtio) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openyurtio/openyurt/pull/1964/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openyurtio) | `52.41% <40.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openyurtio#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[rambohe-ch]

@windnod Thanks for posting pull request. I have commented the issue #1963 , and we need to have more discussion about this case before we merge this pull request. sorry to response you lately.

[stale[bot]]

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.