openyurtio / openyurt

OpenYurt - Extending your native Kubernetes to edge(project under CNCF)
https://openyurt.io
Apache License 2.0
1.68k stars 391 forks source link

intercept kubelet get node request in order to reduce the traffic #2039

Closed vie-serendipity closed 1 month ago

vie-serendipity commented 2 months ago

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespace from that line: /kind bug /kind documentation /kind enhancement /kind good-first-issue /kind feature /kind question /kind design /sig ai /sig iot /sig network /sig storage

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

other Note

codecov[bot] commented 2 months ago

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 34.61538% with 17 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.56%. Comparing base (37addb5) to head (a8cc010). Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/yurthub/cachemanager/cache_manager.go 44.44% 8 Missing and 2 partials :warning:
pkg/yurthub/proxy/util/util.go 12.50% 7 Missing :warning:
Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #2039 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 55.37% 55.56% +0.18% ========================================== Files 185 186 +1 Lines 17821 18079 +258 ========================================== + Hits 9869 10046 +177 - Misses 6934 7009 +75 - Partials 1018 1024 +6 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openyurtio/openyurt/pull/2039/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openyurtio) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openyurtio/openyurt/pull/2039/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openyurtio) | `55.56% <34.61%> (+0.18%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openyurtio#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

vie-serendipity commented 2 months ago

/rerun

vie-serendipity commented 2 months ago

/rerun

vie-serendipity commented 2 months ago

/rerun

vie-serendipity commented 2 months ago

/rerun

vie-serendipity commented 2 months ago

/rerun

vie-serendipity commented 2 months ago

/rerun

vie-serendipity commented 1 month ago

@rambohe-ch I add a check whether it's the first request after reconnection.

sonarcloud[bot] commented 1 month ago

Quality Gate Passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud

rambohe-ch commented 1 month ago

/LGTM