Open kelson42 opened 2 years ago
First part is understood and much needed but the second part either I did not understand or it's not possible.
If you want the CMS to adjust itself to a file rename on the storage backend, this won't happen. Once files are managed by cms, files operations should go through cms.
The second point is about #82 scenario, so about the CMS. I made a specific point about that because if we only track configuration changes, then such changes on the storage backend won’t be logged/tracked.
I understand the need but I believe given our resources, it seems a lot more practical/realistic/safer to just forbid ourselves from manipulating the storage backend directly instead of building/maintaining this.
@rgaudin Agree, we still need a trace, a log entry when done from the CMS.
@rgaudin Agree, we still need a trace, a log entry when done from the CMS.
Already agreed in the beginning of my first comment… 🤷♂️
See #76 for event logging
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be now be reviewed manually. Thank you for your contributions.
Similar to https://github.com/openzim/zimfarm/issues/498. Wee nee
An other point is that if someone renames a ZIM file in the storage backend we should keep track of that as well... even if the configuration has not formally changed!