search

openzim / nautilus

Turns a collection of documents into a browsable ZIM file
GNU General Public License v3.0
19 stars 14 forks source link

Allow for file arborescence #43

Open Popolechien opened 1 year ago

Popolechien commented 1 year ago

Ideally the content should not be a bunch of files but we should have the ability to deal with subfolders

rgaudin commented 1 year ago

Well nautilus's spec was “a bunch of files as a ZIM” 😉 I agree this would be a lot better for large collections. This would require a UI do-over which would be welcome as the current one is very basic.

Jaifroid commented 1 year ago

I agree this would be nice, but I would just like to point out that no matter how fancy the UI becomes, we shouldn't forget the basics of listing all the final documents in the ZIM's title index, so that the documents can be found by using native search in a client, and the ZIM can still be accessed by users who cannot run JavaScript (and so cannot run the custom UI). The associated issue is #42.

kelson42 commented 1 year ago

I'm not super convinced that arborescent view would be the best. Before moving on this I would like to assess this approach based on real problematic use cases.

Popolechien commented 1 year ago

@kelson42 zim-requests/issues/469 is probably a good use case. What started as 5-6 potential zim files (had arborescence been available) ends up being 53 separate zim files because otherwise there would simply be too much content to parse. Same thing with https://library.kiwix.org/zimgit-post-disaster_en which I ended up breaking down into medical, food, and other subsets.

kelson42 commented 1 year ago

@Popolechien How would look like the arborescence for these examples.

Popolechien commented 1 year ago

Nothing fancy - clicking on a folder icon would open up a new page/list.

kelson42 commented 1 year ago

How many items? How deeps? Maybe a simple tag system is better!

stale[bot] commented 1 year ago

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be now be reviewed manually. Thank you for your contributions.

kelson42 commented 1 month ago

@Popolechien @rgaudin Although the discussion was somehow suspended to my last question. It seems a decision has been made but this issue has not been updated. I have no strong opinion on this feature request, but would have been great to get this issue following usual discussion and update.

my main concern is that this is an expensive one and worry about the ratio effort/benefit. What is the status here (and in nautilus-webui where I can not find any trace of this feature!)?