Closed FledgeXu closed 1 year ago
Can you elaborate on why we'd need that? I think it's harmless but for the sake of harmonization, I'd like to know where it's coming from.
Ok, This is something very annoying that comes with macOS. So When you use the Finder.app
open any folder in macOS, this application will automatically create a file in that folder called .DS_Store
.
Maybe I can drop this commit and add it to my global gitignore.
I know about that one, being on macOS as well. The other ones I understand what they do but is that a list you cooked yourself or is that in the default provided by github or your text editor?
@rgaudin It's form the gitignore.io
.
@rgaudin It's form the
gitignore.io
.
Ah that's interesting ; I didn't know this service. What tags did you use? Maybe we could replace it with https://www.toptal.com/developers/gitignore/api/python,macos,windows,linux ? We don't have anything specific in this repo.
And please rebase ;)
Merging base branch into your feature branch is not rebasing…
Sorry, my fault, i push the branch accidentally😅
Ah that's interesting ; I didn't know this service. What tags did you use? Maybe we could replace it with https://www.toptal.com/developers/gitignore/api/python,macos,windows,linux ? We don't have anything specific in this repo.
Yes, we can. It's a pretty handy website. And I used just the macos
tag.
Yes, we can.
Please do ; it's a good opportunity.
This PR is ready for review.
This PR is ready for review.
Is the re-request review button not working? It's the double arrow one next to reviewer name.
Everything's good but since we're using tox, can you move the isort check into tox.ini so it's consistent ?
The you can rewrite your commit history: we don't need 2 commits for formatting ; squash them together and "Fix a bug in ci." is not an appropriate commit name. Actually it should be squashed as well now.
and rebase off main
I'm not sure if we still need to stick
black
andflake8
to the old version and I updated it for now.This PR also contains some changes to
.gitignore
, which may not quite fit the principle of one PR for one feature point, but I thought it was a relatively minor change, so I added it.