One layer of the static layer is heading angle. The values of the dataset for an ascending track seems to be 100 degrees which seems to be the satellite heading angle from east counter clock wise. This angle is not exactly what we should add to the static layer. The layers in the static layer are supposed to describe the los unit vector from target to the platform. We should either provide los unit vector (target to sensor) components in east north and up directions (three layers) or incidence angle and azimuth angle of the los vector (target to the sensor vector). The azimuth angle may be clockwise from north.
If we want to include los unit vector east north and up components, then those parameters should be returned from running topo. If incidence and azimuth angle of LOS is desired, then topo needs to be fixed as discussed here .
What did you expect?
I expected to see the azimuth angle of the LOS vector (target to satellite vector).
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
Describe the bug
One layer of the static layer is heading angle. The values of the dataset for an ascending track seems to be 100 degrees which seems to be the satellite heading angle from east counter clock wise. This angle is not exactly what we should add to the static layer. The layers in the static layer are supposed to describe the los unit vector from target to the platform. We should either provide los unit vector (target to sensor) components in east north and up directions (three layers) or incidence angle and azimuth angle of the los vector (target to the sensor vector). The azimuth angle may be clockwise from north.
If we want to include los unit vector east north and up components, then those parameters should be returned from running topo. If incidence and azimuth angle of LOS is desired, then topo needs to be fixed as discussed here .
What did you expect?
I expected to see the azimuth angle of the LOS vector (target to satellite vector).
Reproducible steps
Environment
No response