At the moment, the CSLC-S1 workflow can generate independently CSLC-S1 products and CSLC-S1 static layers products.
For the generation of the CSLC-S1 products, we are able to assign product_version and product_specification_versionfrom the runconfiguration file. Those two values get written inside the CSLC-S1 products.
Instead, for the CSLC-S1 static layers, the SAS is only able to write in the product_version while the product_specification_version is hard-coded within the SAS
What did you expect?
I expected that the CSLC-S1 would take the product_specification_version value from the runconfiguration file and assign it to the identification/product_specification_version field of the CSLC-S1 static layers product
Checked for duplicates
Yes - I've already checked
Describe the bug
At the moment, the CSLC-S1 workflow can generate independently CSLC-S1 products and CSLC-S1 static layers products. For the generation of the CSLC-S1 products, we are able to assign
product_versionandproduct_specification_versionfrom the runconfiguration file. Those two values get written inside the CSLC-S1 products.Instead, for the CSLC-S1 static layers, the SAS is only able to write in the
product_versionwhile theproduct_specification_versionis hard-coded within the SASWhat did you expect?
I expected that the CSLC-S1 would take the product_specification_version value from the runconfiguration file and assign it to the identification/product_specification_version field of the CSLC-S1 static layers product
Reproducible steps
Environment