Now that catalogd and operator-controller share the same namespace, deployment of operator-controller should properly handle this redundancy and ensure that the version of the olmv1-system namespace from operator-controller is the one that ends up on the cluster.
@joelanford brought up the question of whether this signals that we should consider combining catalogd and operator-controller into a monorepo, especially as the two continue to become more tightly coupled.
Here's the PR for the TLS work that lead to this question.
Now that catalogd and operator-controller share the same namespace, deployment of operator-controller should properly handle this redundancy and ensure that the version of the olmv1-system namespace from operator-controller is the one that ends up on the cluster.
@joelanford brought up the question of whether this signals that we should consider combining catalogd and operator-controller into a monorepo, especially as the two continue to become more tightly coupled.
Here's the PR for the TLS work that lead to this question.