Closed chmeliik closed 5 years ago
@chmeliik Good job, I had just minor comments! Let's wait for owners if they agree with such changes :-)
Maybe public API methods should also have documented which exceptions they raise.
Updated PR, cc @kevinrizza @MartinBasti @awgreene
@chmeliik Can you please squash your commits?
@kevinrizza Can do, do you want all the changes in a single commit?
@kevinrizza Can do, do you want all the changes in a single commit?
@chmeliik Yes please.
Added specific Quay errors, cc @kevinrizza @MartinBasti @awgreene
/lgtm
Updated PR. Had to change the exception hierarchy a bit to allow for an exception that would inherit from the base exception but not from ValueError
. Added a couple simple tests to make sure I didn't mess it up.
cc @MartinBasti @kevinrizza
/lgtm
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed.
Rebased on master
Hi @chmeliik. Thanks for your PR.
I'm waiting for a operator-framework or openshift member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with
/ok-to-test
on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the
ok-to-test
label.I understand the commands that are listed here.