Closed enoch85 closed 6 years ago
I agree. This is a traditional "wizard" use case which we should have, but not until we have replaced the old XML-based wizard for a less arcane approach using our template engine and a simple MVC application.
Maybe we could do a shortcut here, accept a range when adding a vlan "VLAN tag" 1-255 for example.
@AdSchellevis Sure, a shortcut would be nice, but is far from a complete solution.
What I mean is a default template where you fill in which default settings you want to apply to each host/interface using the template.
So as I mentioned, firewall settings for example. It could look something like this:
ok, no shortcut, but keep in mind, a request this size is unlikely to mature... (needs api support for all items in your list first, then a solid wizard extension, etc, etc)....
what if the new "wizard" is the api and we do the model handling underneath? assuming we have all required models of course...
The wizard is not the issue (for example http://www.jquery-steps.com/Examples has some nice options, which might suit our needs), its the size of the request which makes it unlikely to mature. There's still quite some complexity to migrate all requested modules, while keeping all functionality in tact... just saying, you can ask, but don't be disappointed if the request closes in 6-12 months for lack of progress..
@AdSchellevis Can't we at least start with something small, and build it from there? For instance, start with your "shortcut" and firewall settings...
I would be fine with a wizard (e.g "Add new VLAN") that gets better and better. At least as a start until everything is in place for a real template.
sure, we can do steps which don't break future plans, but not in a wizard to glue all together (which will get very messy if we try to pull old code in)...
So we either solve one issue (can I create multiple vlan's at once, which fits the current screen), or we wait for the module to be rebuild and take it step by step from there (which won't likely mature anytime soon because of the amount of time needed to achieve it).
If your planning to work on parts, try to keep changes small so we can guide you through the process.
@AdSchellevis Sorry, I don't have the skills, but I'd prefer to keep this open, even in 6-12 months.
Would be awesome if you could work on it.
timeout
:(
Sad that this died, its the single biggest thing i am missing from Pfsense. trying to setup the rules is insanely tedious and annoying and its filled with trial and error to see if what you are doing is even working. The documentation doesnt really help. Some nice boxes to tick for common use scenarios such as prioritizing common game networks (XBL, Steam, Battlenet etc) as well as common VOIP platforms (Discord, Skype, Slack etc) would go a long way.
Sad that this died
Agreed.
Let's say I want to set up 200 VLANs with different settings, I'd want this process to be smooth. Right now I have to add both Interface, VLAN tag, DHCP settings, Firewall Settings and so on to all the different hosts.
This could be solved with a template that auto generates new IP address for the new host, creates and interface based on template name, prefills it with firewall settings and leaves me with a predefined VLAN. Voila, you just saved me with a ton of work. :)
It's useful in larger networks and if you just want to divide your network into larger VLANs.