As outlined here: MESDK-92 I suggested to untangle the core from solid to understand how a thin reactivity layer(s) - we planned to implement (?) - will look like.
This sets up a resource that triggers if messages have changed inside of fink. I would argue that changes in messages (and changes in plugins, changes in lintrules lint rules and ….) have an effect on on lint reports should be wired up by the sdk's thin layer instead of the code in the linked diff on each consumer. Thats at least where the big benefit from reactivity comes from and how I understand the push towards reactivity from @samuel.stroschein.
If this is what we wan't i am happy to support with the next steps and would have a clear path on what to do - if not I would focus on LIX again or would need more input on how i can support you @jldec with the SDK.
This ticket should reevaluate reactivity in lint reporting
@martin.lysk1 said in MESDK-67:
This ticket should reevaluate reactivity in lint reporting