Open MarkRosemaker opened 1 year ago
For some reason, the time format 2006-01-02T15:04:05.000Z is used instead of the idiomatic time.RFC3339 or time.RFC3339Nano.
2006-01-02T15:04:05.000Z
time.RFC3339
time.RFC3339Nano
This does not work well for different time zones or daylights saving time (playground link).
Possible fixes:
For some reason, the time format
2006-01-02T15:04:05.000Zis used instead of the idiomatictime.RFC3339ortime.RFC3339Nano.This does not work well for different time zones or daylights saving time (playground link).
Possible fixes:
time.RFC3339Nano. It is unclear if API can handle the different format.