All the changes are suggestions, I've done them here for us to discuss. Let me know what you think.
I also trimmed the lines to be max 79 chars. Makes it easier to review PRs and edit.
added misogyny explicitly in the subtitle to be clear about what this is about
questions:
do we want to have the reporting available from the ad-on? would make it much easier for people to do so.
the the browser extension section, the local instance of the model is mentioned in the context of consent vs censorship. But I believe the local instance has more to do with the privacy rather than customization. You can still give the individual a personalized experience w/o having the model on their machine.
I just realized this whole project doesn't have to focus so much on female-identifying people as users. A cic-male straight white guy could also enjoy a cleaner web. If we accept that, not all, but many of the female-identifying terms become user.
Antidote to silicon valley KPI probably needs a bit of explanation?
The research section seems to be mixed with motivation in a way. Doesn't it?
"our browser extension is effective from the word go": I don't understand the sentence.
the part where it talks about creating two new datasets, the first one is not clear how it's tagged.
All the changes are suggestions, I've done them here for us to discuss. Let me know what you think.
I also trimmed the lines to be max 79 chars. Makes it easier to review PRs and edit.
questions: