stuartpb
commented
6 years ago That list of removals, from https://github.com/opws/opws-schemata/issues/1#issuecomment-344449391, is:
- [x] google.com:
username.notes("\"Username\" here describes the name for Gmail addresses. Users do not have to set up a Gmail account name if they use their own email address.\n") - [x] google.com:
registration.notes("Registration accepts either an existing email address or a new Gmail address to register.") - [x] hrblock.com:
password.reset.flow.request.form.notes("Also accepts a combination of first name, last name, Social Security number, and date of birth.") - [x] hrblock.com:
username.reminder.request.form.notes("Also accepts a combination of first name, last name, Social Security number, and date of birth.") - [x] linkedin.com:
password.reset.flow.submit.destination.notes("The stub page includes a \"Sign In\" link, even though you are signed in after submitting the new password.") - [x] linkedin.com:
password.reset.flow.submit.sessions.notes("The form to submit the password includes a checkbox to control whether other sessions should be logged out or not.") - [x] linkedin.com:
password.change.sessions.notes("The form to submit the password includes a checkbox to control whether other sessions should be logged out or not.") - [x] mammothhq.com:
password.reset.flow.response.email.notes("Sender address is a long random name starting with \"bounce\" and ending with @email.mammothhq.com") - [x] netflix.com:
password.reset.flow.request.form.notes("Also accepts a combination of first name, last name, and credit card number.") - [x] ultrahook.com:
registration.notes("\"username\" is technically \"webhook namespace\".\n")
Following the procedure described in https://github.com/opws/opws-schemata/issues/1#issuecomment-344115603, this issue will track all the "notes" properties that aren't getting a formalized location in schema v0.2, which will instead be removed altogether (until such time as a better way of codifying their information is introduced in the schema).
In the future, this kind of stuff will probably be tracked closer to the schemata issue tracker and/or pull requests for a running draft branch of the dataset here, but this is a special case due to the way v0.1 shipped with a hole in validation for notes, and many of the discussions around the properties described in these notes have lingering schema-discussion issues here (to be migrated to the schemata issue tracker in accordance with #308).