Closed giordano closed 5 years ago
This is a very ugly work-around (already used in other tests) rather than a real fix, but at least drastically reduces the rate of randomly failing tests for me: I had 2 failures out of 10 runs locally, compared to a close to 100% failure rate.
Can this be closed now that #398 and #399 are merged?
Yeah, I think so. Let's hope we won't need anything like this in the future :sweat_smile:
This is a very ugly work-around (already used in other tests) rather than a real fix, but at least drastically reduces the rate of randomly failing tests for me: I had 2 failures out of 10 runs locally, compared to a close to 100% failure rate.