This change makes the "enoent" history message short. I always found the message too verbose. Also, like it was, it was meant for an administrator (related to #4411); for the end user it was rather useless. Further, it contained hints at deployment/implementation specifics, some of which are no longer existent (database for history cache).
While there, I did some refactoring of related code.
This change makes the "enoent" history message short. I always found the message too verbose. Also, like it was, it was meant for an administrator (related to #4411); for the end user it was rather useless. Further, it contained hints at deployment/implementation specifics, some of which are no longer existent (database for history cache).
While there, I did some refactoring of related code.