Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
For now it is not possible to overwrite User-Agent header. It is not allowed by
spec (for XMLHttpRequest).
It will require new permission "webRequest" for application. Then application
can overwrite this header.
This feature will be available soon (about 1 month...)
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2012 at 10:41
Excellent, thanks for the program.
Original comment by jonathan...@gmail.com
on 1 Jun 2012 at 4:49
It is not available, yet. There is way to set "User-Agent" header in request
but it only works in chrome dev channel and in new version of the application
witch is not available. As soon as current dev channel becomes stable I will
update application to new version.
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 15 Aug 2012 at 11:58
Hey,
I've already done changes to the code and it working. But unfortunately it
still working on dev channel only because of new API used. When it becomes
stable I will release update to chrome web store.
Before that API if was impossible to overwrite User-Agent header (and many
more) for async XMLHttpRequest.
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2012 at 8:57
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 21 Aug 2012 at 8:57
It is fixed in revision 127. It will be available in next update.
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 27 Sep 2012 at 3:47
Is this feature currently implemented? I've added a custom header, with field
"User-Agent", but in the Request Headers section it seems to use my browser
still. I'm on Chrome 30.0.1599.66 m.
Original comment by crumm...@gmail.com
on 7 Oct 2013 at 6:31
It is still unavailable for Chrome Stable channel. However I already started
working on new implementation on sockets. It is available for all channels but
require from me to implement HTTP protocol by myself so it will take a while.
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 9 Oct 2013 at 7:31
Issue 209 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2013 at 1:41
Issue 194 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2013 at 1:43
Issue 205 has been merged into this issue.
Original comment by jarro...@gmail.com
on 14 Oct 2013 at 1:43
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
jonathan...@gmail.com
on 31 May 2012 at 9:36