Open ebruchez opened 11 years ago
This just makes sense as a way to communicate.
<xbl:binding> <xf:function>...</xf:function>
The function is accessible:
From the outside, the function can be in a namespace. That could be something like:
xmlns:foo="something-with-id-of-the-control"
or:
xmlns:foo="something-with-id-of-binding"
This is related to #764. It probably makes a bit more sense to first implement support for functions in models, and then see how that can be extended to XBL?
This just makes sense as a way to communicate.
The function is accessible:
From the outside, the function can be in a namespace. That could be something like:
or: