Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 9 years ago
See http://code.google.com/p/orc/issues/detail?id=29#c3
I think the general approach we should use is to allow only syntactic types in
the
OIL format, provide a different AST format which supports full type information
for
analysis, and then define conversions between these formats.
Original comment by adrianqu...@gmail.com
on 25 Apr 2009 at 6:35
Fixed.
Original comment by dkitc...@gmail.com
on 3 Sep 2009 at 7:59
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
adrianqu...@gmail.com
on 18 Apr 2009 at 2:24