Open utxo-detective opened 1 year ago
This is theoretically possible but at the moment we do not support it. We decided that it is more important not to accidentally lose inscription than to allow complex disaggregation of outputs. For now you will have to hold on to the inscriptions in this way but we do plan to allow this fine grained control of outputs in the future.
We might also be able to support this easily simply by making the transaction checks more liberal. The idea would be to move checks that we're sending inscriptions to the end of transaction construction, instead of the beginning. That way, if the transaction builder happens to be able to send the inscription you want and all the other ones wind up going back to change, it'll just work.
any updates on this @casey I have a bundle stuck together
I think you can split them out one-by-one by specifying the satpoint of the last inscriptions in the UTXO. Might also work if you specify the inscription id of the last inscription in the UTXO, but not sure about that.
yeah the location of them is strange. also strange that this runestone is joined into them.
I accidentally consolidated some of my inscriptions in two transactions when using a command similar to
ord wallet send <ADDRESS> 12345sat
https://mempool.space/tx/fa0dd811e35cf9aa533171c0f13b4a9b186bc5792f980090566989e2d246f59e https://mempool.space/tx/9da61fb1f6f0a836084da18d39b2887da0665917a0d9f4ad548b3e3320b8f707
At first i thought i had burnt the items, but now i see them on the explorer all in one output
https://ordinals.com/output/fa0dd811e35cf9aa533171c0f13b4a9b186bc5792f980090566989e2d246f59e:0 https://ordinals.com/output/fa0dd811e35cf9aa533171c0f13b4a9b186bc5792f980090566989e2d246f59e:0
My question is how do i split them when i want to send to someone else? Is it just
ord wallet send ADDRESS INSCRIPTION_ID
?