fix(patch): Sort benchmarks in lexical order so that run order is consistent with output order

[hassila]

Description

Currently the run order is random while the output is lexically sorted, this PR makes both sorted.

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.

Minimal checklist:

• [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [ ] I have added DocC code-level documentation for any public interfaces exported by the package
• [ ] I have added unit and/or integration tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #177 (ea898e6) into main (b0f6d12) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is n/a.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/177?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #177 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 71.01% 71.01% ======================================= Files 26 26 Lines 3470 3470 ======================================= Hits 2464 2464 Misses 1006 1006 ``` ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/177?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/177?src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Last update [b0f6d12...ea898e6](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/177?src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one).

[github-actions[bot]]

Pull request benchmark comparison [ubuntu-latest] with 'main' run at 2023-08-16T10:53:38+00:00 Pull request had performance regressions