feat(minor): Avoid rebuilds

[hassila]

Description

We used to unconditionally build all benchmark targets regardless of operation.

Changed logic so that we for baseline read/list/check operations don't rebuild, as we will not execute the benchmark for such operations.

How Has This Been Tested?

Manually tested.

Minimal checklist:

• [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [ ] I have added DocC code-level documentation for any public interfaces exported by the package
• [ ] I have added unit and/or integration tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Merging #207 (23a32fd) into main (dba4133) will not change coverage. The diff coverage is 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #207 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 70.40% 70.40% ======================================= Files 29 29 Lines 3909 3909 ======================================= Hits 2752 2752 Misses 1157 1157 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Tests/BenchmarkTests/AdditionalTests.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one#diff-VGVzdHMvQmVuY2htYXJrVGVzdHMvQWRkaXRpb25hbFRlc3RzLnN3aWZ0) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Tests/BenchmarkTests/AdditionalTests.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one#diff-VGVzdHMvQmVuY2htYXJrVGVzdHMvQWRkaXRpb25hbFRlc3RzLnN3aWZ0) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | | ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Last update [dba4133...23a32fd](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/207?src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one).

[github-actions[bot]]

Pull request benchmark comparison [ubuntu-latest] with 'main' run at 2023-12-15T11:04:27+00:00 Pull request had performance regressions