fix(minor): Fail CI also for update benchmark baseline updates that fails due to EPERM

[hassila]

Description

To ensure we don't "succeed" when the benchmark throws due to permissioning errors (e.g. networking without disabling sandbox)

How Has This Been Tested?

Manually tested with distributed system.

Minimal checklist:

• [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [ ] I have added DocC code-level documentation for any public interfaces exported by the package
• [ ] I have added unit and/or integration tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Comparison is base (645e475) 70.40% compared to head (6b00da3) 70.40%.

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/212?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #212 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 70.40% 70.40% ======================================= Files 29 29 Lines 3909 3909 ======================================= Hits 2752 2752 Misses 1157 1157 ``` ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/212?src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/212?src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Last update [645e475...6b00da3](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/212?src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one).

[github-actions[bot]]

Pull request benchmark comparison [ubuntu-latest] with 'main' run at 2023-12-20T16:08:58+00:00 Pull request had performance regressions