feat(patch): At least fix ifdefs for additional platforms

[hassila]

Description

Include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context.

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes.

Minimal checklist:

• [ ] I have performed a self-review of my own code
• [ ] I have added DocC code-level documentation for any public interfaces exported by the package
• [ ] I have added unit and/or integration tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 50.00000% with 1 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 65.30%. Comparing base (cb80cf2) to head (6a5c59a).

Additional details and impacted files

[](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #251 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 65.30% 65.30% ======================================= Files 33 33 Lines 3597 3597 ======================================= Hits 2349 2349 Misses 1248 1248 ``` | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Sources/Benchmark/BenchmarkClock.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=Sources%2FBenchmark%2FBenchmarkClock.swift&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one#diff-U291cmNlcy9CZW5jaG1hcmsvQmVuY2htYXJrQ2xvY2suc3dpZnQ=) | `35.48% <50.00%> (ø)` | | | [Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [Sources/Benchmark/BenchmarkClock.swift](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?src=pr&el=tree&filepath=Sources%2FBenchmark%2FBenchmarkClock.swift&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one#diff-U291cmNlcy9CZW5jaG1hcmsvQmVuY2htYXJrQ2xvY2suc3dpZnQ=) | `35.48% <50.00%> (ø)` | | ------ [Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=continue&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). > **Legend** - [Click here to learn more](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/codecov-delta?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one) > `Δ = absolute (impact)`, `ø = not affected`, `? = missing data` > Powered by [Codecov](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=footer&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Last update [cb80cf2...6a5c59a](https://app.codecov.io/gh/ordo-one/package-benchmark/pull/251?dropdown=coverage&src=pr&el=lastupdated&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one). Read the [comment docs](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/pull-request-comments?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=ordo-one).

[github-actions[bot]]

Pull request had an unknown failure Pull request benchmark comparison [ubuntu-latest] with 'main' run at 2024-05-22T06:53:19+00:00