codecov[bot]
commented
2 years ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (
5f23575) to head (63ba973). Report is 54 commits behind head on master.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #10 +/- ## ========================================= Coverage 100.00% 100.00% ========================================= Files 7 7 Lines 697 697 Branches 92 92 ========================================= Hits 697 697 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/oremanj/greenback/pull/10/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Joshua+Oreman) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [cpython](https://app.codecov.io/gh/oremanj/greenback/pull/10/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Joshua+Oreman) | `98.85% <ø> (ø)` | | | [pypy36release](https://app.codecov.io/gh/oremanj/greenback/pull/10/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Joshua+Oreman) | `93.59% <ø> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=Joshua+Oreman#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
The base checkpoint cost in the microbenchmark has become much slower since the last time I ran it, but that's not really greenback's fault. I don't remember whether the previous run was on the same laptop so it's possible that explains it. I updated the description to be clearer about the conditions.