I have a question regarding licensing. The package is published under Apache 2.0 license. However, I see that some libraries that it uses are published under licenses that prohibits commercial use. For example, "org.scn.community.databound" package also shows Apache 2.0 license but if you open one of the JS files inside that package - "AdvancedDataTable.js" - then the comment at the top of that file says:
/**
* CC BY-NC-SA License
* Advanced Data Table by Mike Howles is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
* Based on a work at http://github.com/org-scn-design-studio-community/sdkpackage/tree/master/src/org.scn.community.databound/res/AdvancedDataTable
*
*/
May be I'm not clear about how licensing works and if one supersedes another depending on where they are specified or how the package is released, but I was wondering what the impact of JS files that are included in this package that are licensed under "CC BY-NC-SA" license.
I have a question regarding licensing. The package is published under Apache 2.0 license. However, I see that some libraries that it uses are published under licenses that prohibits commercial use. For example, "org.scn.community.databound" package also shows Apache 2.0 license but if you open one of the JS files inside that package - "AdvancedDataTable.js" - then the comment at the top of that file says:
May be I'm not clear about how licensing works and if one supersedes another depending on where they are specified or how the package is released, but I was wondering what the impact of JS files that are included in this package that are licensed under "CC BY-NC-SA" license.