Open RedAuburn opened 2 weeks ago
What value will it bring? Regenerate for cases when a developer forgot to include those commits? For such cases it'd be better to remind/warn developers (e.g. by failing tests) instead of trying to auto-fix it IMHO.
- Could this be used for Style changes merge bottleneck #6167 ?
For that it'll have to remove the currently present (in the PR) regenerate commits and add new ones...
What value will it bring? Regenerate for cases when a developer forgot to include those commits?
it would mean that developers wouldn't need to add those commits in the first place, as it would be done automatically. this would also mean regenerating the commits for a merge would just be a case of re-running the action, instead of messaging, then waiting for the dev to push, then merging. it sidesteps the little dance that's needed to merge things in order
it would mean that developers wouldn't need to add those commits in the first place, as it would be done automatically.
That means a developer must not forget to remove those the commits before the push..
this would also mean regenerating the commits for a merge would just be a case of re-running the action, instead of messaging, then waiting for the dev to push, then merging. it sidesteps the little dance that's needed to merge things in order
That would be nice indeed! So this action would be capable of removing the conflicting commits first?
That means a developer must not forget to remove those the commits before the push..
not if they never added them 😉
That would be nice indeed! So this action would be capable of removing the conflicting commits first?
i believe so, it might be a little bit of scripting to make work though
That means a developer must not forget to remove those the commits before the push..
not if they never added them 😉
That means the PR was not tested by the developer - not a type of behavior we'd like to promote 😂
That means the PR was not tested by the developer - not a type of behavior we'd like to promote 😂
good point.. still, the second use-case is still useful 😅
That would be nice indeed! So this action would be capable of removing the conflicting commits first?
i believe so, it might be a little bit of scripting to make work though
Then the action should
https://github.com/marketplace/actions/git-auto-commit
we could use this to automatically regenerate styles and strings when a PR is submitted