Open RedAuburn opened 2 weeks ago
The current logic is to treat gravel/fine_gravel as footways only in case there is explicit good smoothness/tracktype, i.e. if we're certain its of good park/urban quality.
Otherwise gravel/fine_gravel could be used on rough trails also.
The current logic is to treat gravel/fine_gravel as footways only in case there is explicit good smoothness/tracktype, i.e. if we're certain its of good park/urban quality.
Otherwise gravel/fine_gravel could be used on rough trails also.
hmm, i get the logic, but in my experience gravel footways in cities etc rarely have smoothness tagged..
i still think that fine_gravel is likely to be a reasonably smooth footway though. eg. the example image on the osm wiki:
Yeap we might treat fine_gravel
same as compacted
?
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/52868110