Closed afogelberg closed 8 years ago
I can at least start by doing a draft/outline for the readme file, unless someone else has already started working on this issue?
Go for it!
I've created a new branch for the updated readme-file. I added a few suggestions for headings. It is still missing a few things:
@afogelberg @jokd could you take a look at the updated readme?
Nice work @markus659 Looks really good. We have a license file, maybe we can point to that in the meantime? I think we should make the requirements section a bit more clear, node.js is required for development but not for deployment if using release (when we have one).
Please create a pull request and merge.
I think it looks great. Perhaps the links that are not yet valid should be removed to avoid confusing. @afogelberg has created a awesome logo :)
I will try to find the logo :) Agree with @jokd that it is best to remove the invalid links for now,
Thank you for the feedback. I removed invalid links and references. I'm not sure what you meant by pointing to the license file @afogelberg, but I added a link to it. I also removed the "requirements" section for now.
Looks good to me!
Can we merge your branch @markus659 ? It looks good to me.
Yes, you can go ahead and merge @afogelberg (you can remove the branch as well). I also added a link to Sigtunakartan and fixed the URL to Västerås Stads samlingskarta.
Currently there is no project description for Origo. This needs to be added.