Closed ahoarau closed 2 years ago
Indeed, if that is ok for KDL mantainers it would be great!
I leave this one to decide to @smits @meyerj.
Also this requires the header of all files to be changed.
@MatthijsBurgh this is ok from my side, you might want to check if there are files that have copyrights not owned by me.
Yes these files are definitely there. I am sorry, but I don't feel the responsibility to get consent from all the copyright holders. I think that is up to @ahoarau and @traversaro to do it
ok @MatthijsBurgh I'm closing this to re-open a new one. I'm gonna notify all contributors, not only headers names. I believe this is necessary for legal reasons. Also, the MIT license seems more appropriate. That "notice code changes" is cumbersome.
Hi there !
In the context of a private company with proprietary code, having an LGPLv2 can be problematic. The biggest concern is that it prevents from statically link against the library easily.
I propose to change the license to the more permissive Apache-2.0, as you did for all ros2 related stuff
They did the license change in PlotJuggler: https://github.com/facontidavide/PlotJuggler/issues/690 Basically we create an issue and wait for everyone to accept the change.
@MatthijsBurgh What do you think ?
PS: Other licenses might just work as well (MIT)