search

orocos / soem

ROS package wrapping the Simple Open EtherCAT Master (SOEM) from https://github.com/OpenEtherCATsociety/SOEM
http://wiki.ros.org/soem
77 stars 62 forks source link

Giving up maintainership - any volunteers? #46

Closed mgruhler closed 2 years ago

mgruhler commented 2 years ago

Hi all,

I'm finding less and less time (which has been very limited to begin with) mainting the ROS wrapper around the SOEM library, and thus, I'll not be able to support here much longer. If anyone is interested, I'll be happy to transfer ownership of this repo to another individual or an org who will take over.

Mentioning a few of the people that have been active on issues / PRs around here: @smits @meyerj @etorta @ValATG @mictas @MatthijsBurgh @cplasberg @edhage

MatthijsBurgh commented 2 years ago

Might be good to just transfer this to @orocos.

P.S. don't forget the gbp repo as well

mgruhler commented 2 years ago

@MatthijsBurgh Thanks for the suggestion. I'd be happy to do that, given that the @orocos team agrees :-) How are you related to OROCOS? I see that you have orocos in your profile, I want to avoid putting it on people that don't know about this...

(Thanks for the pointer about the gbp repo, I've not forgotten about that :-) )

MatthijsBurgh commented 2 years ago

I am mostly a user of the packages of @orocos. It was setup by KU Leuven. Now most of the people are working at @intermodalics. I am only a maintainer of the KDL library. I used this package in the past in combination with their rtt_soem package. So I know there is a direct connection there and people may not have that much time, but they do have the knowledge.

I don't know how much time/knowledge the other people you mentioned have.

mgruhler commented 2 years ago

Anyone?

@MatthijsBurgh I totally agree with your points above and that @orocos might be a suitable place. But I'm a bit reluctant to just transfer it without consent...

meyerj commented 2 years ago

Apparently there was not a lot of activity here recently and the tracked version of SOEM is stable. So also not much maintenance work, except maybe for future ROS 2 releases... I see that a ROS 2 version was already proposed in https://github.com/mgruhler/soem/issues/20.

As one of the Orocos maintainers, I would agree with moving the repository to the @orocos organization. Still, anyone else who volunteers and wants to become the official maintainer for this package can get the necessary access rights on GitHub.

mgruhler commented 2 years ago

@meyerj thanks for the offer. And yes, there has not much been going on, seeing that most stuff works and, as you say, the upstream repo is quite stable. Most traffic has been the occasional question about ehtercat/soem usage, but most is too specific for my limited knowledge and not ROS related, which is why I deflect most to the upstream repo.

I'll be happy to transfer it to the @orocos team. It is probably in better hands at an org than an individual anyways.

The biggest piece of work will definitely be a ROS2 "port". There are several available already, though non has been released, that last time I checked.

Thanks again, I'll transfer it in the next day or two and ping you again.

mgruhler commented 2 years ago

@meyerj thanks for the invite. I've now transfered the soem repo to orocos. I assume you want me to transfer soem-gbp to the orocos-gbp group, but I've don't got the rights to do so. If you grant them to me, I'll move it. I've also added you as a collaborator. Maybe you can move it yourself (or maybe I have to grant you additional rights once you accept the invite).

Thanks!

meyerj commented 2 years ago

@meyerj thanks for the invite. I've now transfered the soem repo to orocos. I assume you want me to transfer soem-gbp to the orocos-gbp group, but I've don't got the rights to do so. If you grant them to me, I'll move it. I've also added you as a collaborator. Maybe you can move it yourself (or maybe I have to grant you additional rights once you accept the invite).

That should work now, too. The checkboxes to allow team members to create new repositories were not enabled for the orocos-gbp organization.

I also accepted the invite, but I cannot move the repository out of your personal namespace, at least not with the current permissions.

mgruhler commented 2 years ago

@meyerj Thank you. The Collaborator permissions remain a mistery to me :shrug:

I've now moved soem-gbp to the orocos-gbp org as well.

Thank you for your interest. This helps a lot. I think the orocos org is the right place for this repo. I've just recently lost access to my last Ethercat device, due to a "relocation" at work. So I just don't feel fit to maintain this any longer.

Thanks again!