Closed nightshade427 closed 10 years ago
Any ideas?
Hmm reviewing everything, I thought I found the problem, but after closer inspection the code looks fine. I'll review it a bit closer when I get home (next hour or so).
Awesome, thanks! :)
I believe this is fixed by 613891e. Please confirm!
Took a lot of digging, but I finally found it, and managed to fix another bug or two while rooting around.
Works great!!
Thanks :)
Thanks for all the reports...this library would be a lot buggier without you!
Thanks for the awesome package and great support, you rock!
Okay new issue with same 4th value. Even though it is 200 and has no redirect the scheme is changed from https to http.
(as:with-event-loop (:catch-app-errors t)
(asf:multiple-future-bind (body status headers ruri)
(drakma-async:http-request "https://www.firma8.com/assets/logo.png" :method :head :additional-headers '(("Connection" . "close")))
(format t "~s ~s ~s ~s" body status headers ruri)))
HEAD /assets/logo.png HTTP/1.1
Host: www.firma8.com
User-Agent: Drakma/1.3.9 (SBCL 1.1.18; Linux; 3.14.4-x86_64-linode40; http://weitz.de/drakma/)
Accept: */*
Connection: close
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: nginx/1.2.2
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 02:12:18 GMT
Content-Type: image/png
Content-Length: 6244
Last-Modified: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:48:38 GMT
Connection: close
Expires: Thu, 31 Dec 2037 23:55:55 GMT
Cache-Control: max-age=315360000
Cache-Control: public
Accept-Ranges: bytes
NIL 200 ((:SERVER . "nginx/1.2.2")
(:DATE . "Wed, 25 Jun 2014 02:12:18 GMT")
(:CONTENT-TYPE . "image/png") (:CONTENT-LENGTH . "6244")
(:LAST-MODIFIED . "Tue, 22 Apr 2014 16:48:38 GMT")
(:CONNECTION . "close")
(:EXPIRES . "Thu, 31 Dec 2037 23:55:55 GMT")
(:CACHE-CONTROL . "max-age=315360000,public")
(:ACCEPT-RANGES . "bytes")) #<PURI:URI http://www.firma8.com/assets/logo.png>
Any ideas on work around?
Hey, been a hard two weeks, hence the delay...probably won't be able to look at this for a few days. Hang in there, I'll be back in the game soon.
kk, let me know
Please do a pull and try now =]
Works great! Thanks ;)
Using drakma with like the following
I get the following for the 4th value, which is correct
But if I use drakma async with the following
I get this which isnt correct :(