Closed rly closed 3 years ago
I agree that this will be useful to do. My main question is how we deal with this with regard to backward compatibility?
For the new tables, I don't see an issue with creating a new type. For the existing TimeIntervals
table, we may have to wait until the next major version of the schema to update it to use the new type...
Sounds reasonable
The
IntracellularStimuliTable
andIntracellularResponsesTable
types both have a dataset:Aside from the name and docstring, this is the same as the definition for the
'timeseries'
column of theTimeIntervals
table. Since this exact structure would now be used three times in the schema, I think this should be its own type named something likeTimeSeriesRef
orTimeSeriesColumn
and included in the table, e.g.: