ory / kratos

The most scalable and customizable identity server on the market. Replace your Homegrown, Auth0, Okta, Firebase with better UX and DX. Has all the tablestakes: Passkeys, Social Sign In, Multi-Factor Auth, SMS, SAML, TOTP, and more. Written in Go, cloud native, headless, API-first. Available as a service on Ory Network and for self-hosters.
https://www.ory.sh/?utm_source=github&utm_medium=banner&utm_campaign=kratos
Apache License 2.0
11.3k stars 964 forks source link

Support verifying email with OIDC when linking from settings flow #3595

Open riyaz-ali opened 1 year ago

riyaz-ali commented 1 year ago

Preflight checklist

Ory Network Project

No response

Describe your problem

I am working on building an invitation-based system using recovery flow. I create user's identity manually using /admin/identities endpoint, then create a link using /admin/recovery/link. When the user follows the link, they get a (privileged?) session and are redirected to flows.settings.ui_url where they can then connect their social accounts.

Describe your ideal solution

Following #3448, we can now verify user's email_address when signing up with an OIDC provider. I'd like to extend this to include cases when linking social accounts from settings flow as well.

Workarounds or alternatives

The only workaround I'm aware of is to go through a separate verification flow.

Version

Master (6a0a914)

Additional Context

No response

github-actions[bot] commented 3 weeks ago

Hello contributors!

I am marking this issue as stale as it has not received any engagement from the community or maintainers for a year. That does not imply that the issue has no merit! If you feel strongly about this issue

Throughout its lifetime, Ory has received over 10.000 issues and PRs. To sustain that growth, we need to prioritize and focus on issues that are important to the community. A good indication of importance, and thus priority, is activity on a topic.

Unfortunately, burnout has become a topic of concern amongst open-source projects.

It can lead to severe personal and health issues as well as opening catastrophic attack vectors.

The motivation for this automation is to help prioritize issues in the backlog and not ignore, reject, or belittle anyone.

If this issue was marked as stale erroneously you can exempt it by adding the backlog label, assigning someone, or setting a milestone for it.

Thank you for your understanding and to anyone who participated in the conversation! And as written above, please do participate in the conversation if this topic is important to you!

Thank you 🙏✌️