Closed b10n1k closed 2 months ago
Can you clarify how you tested that? As we don't have automatic tests for autoyast yet that matters :)
with yast autoyast check-profile
. I didnt try to perform an installation in some VM.
Can you clarify how you tested that? As we don't have automatic tests for autoyast yet that matters :)
with
yast autoyast check-profile
. I didnt try to perform an installation in some VM.
hm, I don't know if yast autoyast check-profile
is depending on the OS version on which it's called or if it can be trusted to not produce false positives so please verify with an actual installation if this works as expected.
The commit message is not very easy to read and contains a few grammar mistakes. This is also technically not fixing anything at this point. What about:
Avoid using deprecated Autoyast config for firewall
* Avoid deprecation warning about using firewall property
from SuSEfirewall2 times
* Use firewalld configuration instead
Related ticket: https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/156169
And yes, it would make sense to test this, e.g. by installing it in a VM.
Avoid using deprecated Autoyast config for firewall
- Avoid deprecation warning about using firewall property from SuSEfirewall2 times
- Use firewalld configuration instead
Updated on 287f0cd31
Configure the firewall properties as SuSEfirewall2 has been replaced by firewalld and the validation produce a warning. FW_CONFIGURATIONS_EXT keeps working so far because is supported but it is deprecated.
https://progress.opensuse.org/issues/156169