Open JohnAAbbott opened 1 year ago
Sorry. It seems to have merged the 3 screenshots into a single large image. I hope it is nonetheless comprehensible.
This is in the end a problem with the search tool used by Documenter.jl, not sure we can do much about it at this point, but then again I asked @aaruni96 to look a bit into this some time ago, but he essentially did run into a brick wall :-/.
We could try to talk to the Documenter people again, but in the end, we may either have to assign/hire someone to work on it, switch to a different documentation system (difficult at this point...) or live with it.
A related search problem is searching for quo
which lists tons and tons of hits; then try to find the one for e.g. MPolyRing
. good luck
Describe the bug There are (at least) two descriptions of
quo
. The descriptions about the returned map are inconsistent (see attached screenshots). One description agrees with my experiments: namely the map returned (as 2nd value) is the canonical quotient R -> R/I; unfortunately searching forquotient ring
in the help search window leads first to the other entry.To Reproduce Go to the latest documentation: https://docs.oscar-system.org/stable/ Enter
quotient ring
in the search box. And click on first supplied link:[Quotient Rings](https://docs.oscar-system.org/stable/Hecke/orders/ideals/#Quotient-Rings) (section, Ideals)
Expected behavior Perhaps make the link to
Generic residue rings
appear closer to the top of the list of offered links. I note that there is also a link toResidue rings
(from Nemo). The links could give more information about the contexts in which they are relevant.System (please complete the following information): I refer to the documentation at the link given above (on 2023-02-08). And the Oscar version I tried is:
Screenshot 1
Screenshot 2
Screenshot 3
Additional context Add any other context about the problem here.