Closed voggesbe closed 8 months ago
I think this is fixed in the current version of OSCAR?
julia> R = root_system(:D, 6);
julia> ro = [root(R, i).vec for i = 1:num_roots(R)]
60-element Vector{QQMatrix}:
[1 0 0 0 0 0]
[0 1 0 0 0 0]
[0 0 1 0 0 0]
...
julia> Oscar.versioninfo(full=true)
OSCAR version 0.14.0-DEV - #master, b7026701fb -- 2024-01-02 16:57:56 +0000
combining:
AbstractAlgebra.jl v0.34.7
GAP.jl v0.10.1
Hecke.jl v0.23.3 - #eigen, 6031809361 -- 2024-01-04 15:30:54 +0100
Nemo.jl v0.38.3
Polymake.jl v0.11.9
Singular.jl v0.21.1
building on:
Antic_jll v0.201.500+0
Arb_jll v200.2300.0+0
Calcium_jll v0.401.100+0
FLINT_jll v200.900.7+0
GAP_jll v400.1200.200+7
Singular_jll v403.212.1202+0
libpolymake_julia_jll v0.11.2+0
libsingular_julia_jll v0.40.9+0
polymake_jll v400.1100.1+0
See `]st -m` for a full list of dependencies.
Julia Version 1.10.0
Commit 3120989f39b (2023-12-25 18:01 UTC)
Build Info:
Official https://julialang.org/ release
Platform Info:
OS: Linux (x86_64-linux-gnu)
CPU: 20 × 13th Gen Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-13600
WORD_SIZE: 64
LIBM: libopenlibm
LLVM: libLLVM-15.0.7 (ORCJIT, goldmont)
Threads: 1 on 20 virtual cores
Environment:
JULIA_EDITOR = vim
Official https://julialang.org/ release
This has already been fixed in https://github.com/oscar-system/Oscar.jl/pull/2982.
Describe the bug When calling the roots of certain root systems, the programme returns the wrong roots. In my case, I was working with D6 and got 72 roots. However, this should only be 60 roots. Also, the root vectors are wrong. One can check GAP e.g. for comparison.
To Reproduce
Expected behavior As mentioned above, the roots in ro should look different and there should only be 60 of them. A correct output for ro would be given when using the following code in julia:
System (please complete the following information): Please paste the output of
Oscar.versioninfo(full=true)
below. If this does not work, please paste the output of Julia'sversioninfo()
and your Oscar version.