Open thofma opened 2 years ago
If the representations are independent in the sense that the entries of the matrices of two different representations lie in different number fields then it is not possible to form direct sums or tensor products of such representations. Don't we need the possibility to prescribe a common number field over which all matrices are expected to live?
If the representations are independent in the sense that the entries of the matrices of two different representations lie in different number fields then it is not possible to form direct sums or tensor products of such representations.
Sure, they will be G-modules over different number fields. I do not intend to combine them in any way.
Don't we need the possibility to prescribe a common number field over which all matrices are expected to live?
This functionality should probably exist but I think it is not relevant when one is asking for minimal fields of realization (common field and minimality of the individual fields is incompatible).
So that I don't forget about it, here is a small feature request relating to some topic in the book: Given a finite group
G
, I would like to have for every irreducible complex character (or a set of non-Galois conjugate characters) a G-module realizing this character with the field having minimal degree. We may assume thatG
is solvable and that all rational Schur indices are trivial. The one thing I am not sure about is how the function should be called. Maybe something like(although I am not sure what the
QQ
is doing, maybe extensions ofQQ
). Or maybeto say that I want number fields?!
In Magma I would iterate over the characters and given such an irreducible character
chi
I would callGModule(chi : Minimal := true)
(or something like that). But as far as I understand, we already have code to determine G-modules realizing all irreducible complex characters (thanks @fieker!), so it makes more sense to ask for them all at once.CC: @fieker