Closed GoogleCodeExporter closed 8 years ago
thanks for reporting this issue.
Which version do you use?
Original comment by olikr...@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 9:27
This issue is reproduced in ver. 1.08 and 1.09
Original comment by dzmitry....@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 9:49
This is the code for 1.09. What did you modify? Did you increase the existing
delay?
void u8g_com_arduino_fast_parallel_write(u8g_t *u8g, uint8_t val)
{
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 0, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 1, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 2, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 3, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 4, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 5, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 6, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
u8g_com_arduino_fast_write_data_pin( 7, val&1 );
val >>= 1;
/* EN cycle time must be 1 micro second */
u8g_com_arduino_digital_write(u8g, U8G_PI_EN, HIGH);
u8g_MicroDelay(); /* delay by 1000ns, reference: ST7920: 140ns, SBN1661: 100ns */
u8g_com_arduino_digital_write(u8g, U8G_PI_EN, LOW);
}
Original comment by olikr...@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 10:14
No, I added new one delay at the end of this method. The same delay is used in
method "u8g_com_arduino_parallel_write".
Original comment by dzmitry....@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 10:24
oh, you mean:
/* EN cycle time must be 1 micro second, digitalWrite is slow enough to do this */
u8g_com_arduino_digital_write(u8g, U8G_PI_EN, HIGH);
u8g_MicroDelay(); /* delay by 1000ns, reference: ST7920: 140ns, SBN1661: 100ns */
u8g_com_arduino_digital_write(u8g, U8G_PI_EN, LOW);
u8g_10MicroDelay(); /* ST7920 commands: 72us */ <<<<<<< YOU ADDED THIS???
}
Original comment by olikr...@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 10:33
Yes
Original comment by dzmitry....@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 10:34
ok, done
Original comment by olikr...@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 10:46
THANKS!!!!
Original comment by olikr...@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 10:46
no problem :)
Original comment by dzmitry....@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 10:52
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
dzmitry....@gmail.com
on 14 Jan 2013 at 8:03