Closed ndombrowski closed 1 month ago
Hi @ndombrowski , thanks for asking. Bakta uses Pyrodigal and BioPython for all internal translations. Based on a quick look into docs/codes of both, this should in principle be no problem.
Could you provide or point me to a public test genome?
Hi @oschwengers, thanks for the quick reply.
There is no type material as far as I know but Aalborg_AAW-1 should do and is also annotated with translation table 25 in NCBI.
Thanks a lot for checking!
Thanks a lot!
I've added support for translation table 25
. A quick test based on your test genome was successful.
Now, this is active in the main
branch, and will be publicly available in the upcoming v1.10.0
- then, Bakta should be ready to conquer Candidate Division SR1 and the Gracilibacteria ;-)
I'll close this. If there are any issues or questions, please, do not hesitate to re-open it.
Thanks for the great tool,
I have a question: at the moment Bakta allows to choose between translation tables 4 and 11 and I was just wondering if it would be possible to implement code 25 for Candidate Division SR1 and Gracilibacteria as well?
Thanks a lot for considering! Regards, Nina