Issues remaining for Final Draft

cloudhead commented 5 years ago

[x] Introduce oscoin as another name for "open source coin"
[x] Reference TrustRank
[x] Remove mentions of pledging/stake
[x] Explain the intuition on why the structure of os projects is different than the web, and why that leads us to add contributors to the graph.
[x] Mention vesting on reward tokens
[x] Clear up confusion around term "bidirectional" in 3.4
[x] Talk about checkpointing incentive? (Receive more Osrank from contributors)
[x] Talk in more detail about why we're using a blockchain. (Governance, minting)
[x] Mention concerns about PoW at scale
[x] Acknowledge and address issue with false dependencies and omissions in Future Work section
[x] Improve background section's language around OSS
[x] Mention the primary focus on libraries and "upstream" dependencies
[x] Talk about "Free Software"
[ ] Write conclusion

hxrts commented 5 years ago

[x] Reference Cathedral & Bazaar Eric S. Raymond. The Cathedral and the Bazaar: Musings on Linux and Open Source by an Accidental Revolutionary. 1999.
[x] False Ecosystems section doesn't sufficiently address scenario where an important package creates fraudulent dependencies or splits packages to increase their payout

cloudhead commented 5 years ago

@hxrts where would you reference Cathedral & Bazaar? (I think it's a good idea)

hxrts commented 5 years ago

I think you may have found a place after our discussion, but if not I can make a suggestion when I see the most recent version tomorrow.

hxrts commented 5 years ago

May want to add writing a conclusion to this list as well.

oscoin / whitepaper