search

osgi / bugzilla-archive

Archive of OSGi Alliance Specification Bugzilla bugs. The Specification Bugzilla system was decommissioned with the move to GitHub. The issues in this repository are imported from the Specification Bugzilla system for archival purposes.
0 stars 1 forks source link

RMT InstanceId nodes don't follow the definition #2262

Closed bjhargrave closed 9 years ago

bjhargrave commented 12 years ago

Original bug ID: BZ#2394 From: Evgeni Grigorov <e.grigorov@prosyst.com> Reported version: R4 V4.3

bjhargrave commented 12 years ago

Comment author: Evgeni Grigorov <e.grigorov@prosyst.com>

The issue is that InstanceId nodes are defined as integers, but 117.12.11 Instance Id: " An Object Model can define a child node InstanceId. The InstanceId node, if present, holds a long value that has the following qualities: " i.e. the instance id should be a long value.

My personal opinion is that the definition is wrong, because those instance id nodes come from TR-069. In TR-069 Amendment 4 specification, they are defines as: A.2.2.1 Instance Number Identifier: " An Instance Number is expressed as a positive integer (>=1) " Am I missing something?

bjhargrave commented 12 years ago

Comment author: Evgeni Grigorov <e.grigorov@prosyst.com>

An errata text: "The InstanceId node, if present, holds a long value that has the following qualities" can be: The InstanceId node, if present, holds an integer value that has the following qualities

"Its value must be between 1 and Long.MAX_VALUE." can be: Its value must be between 1 and Integer.MAX_VALUE.

bjhargrave commented 11 years ago

Comment author: Kai Hackbarth <k.hackbarth@prosyst.com>

Shige to comment on this

bjhargrave commented 9 years ago

Comment author: Evgeni Grigorov <e.grigorov@prosyst.com>

TR-069 Specification, A.2.2.1 Instance Number Identifier: " An Instance Number is expressed as a positive integer (>=1) " Integer here is not a type, but just a integer number. That's why the definition is correct. InstanceId definition doesn't specify data types, it's up to the data model to use correct types.