Closed frodrigo closed 4 years ago
We should add the postal address in the subtitle.
I've started a branch: https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/compare/tourism_office
From place from data.gouv, 202062 lines Categories stats: https://pastebin.com/QtWqu7D0
All have PlaceOfInterest and PointOfInterest.
I think we can ignore all generic Accommodation and Lodging.
Low frequency contains interesting thing... but there have low frequency.
Camping or Church can be the next step as they can be found on imagery.
I make the analyser generic. https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/pull/883
Can we have something like this and let the user choose the kind of amenity/shop when we have several ones in the source dataset ?
Multiple fixes are not implemented in merge analyser. Should require to have multiple Generate
parts. On Sirene is just done like this https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/merge_data/shop_FR.mapping.json#L17-L18
Merge Restaurant, Camping and Church. Remove pervious Restaurant for Aquitaine and Saône-et-Loire
Also disable merge_tourism_FR_aquitaine_information.
We have analyser_merge_tourism_FR_aquitaine_camp_caravan.py but with:
Can we have both from Datatourisme?
Camping http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8140&class=330
Church, few, probably only touristic ones (hidden item) http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8101&class=320&useDevItem=all
Restaurant http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8240&class=340
We have a static conflation distance, we should move it into the json file.
I have setup a configurable conflation distance.
@vinber please, can you look about the ref? The in Datatourisme seam to be just the same as from local producer.
Camping have a wide range of application from farm camping to tourism=hotel.
yes, i think in case of TourinFrance (tourinsoft, sirtaqui for exemple ?) / the ref seems to be same than the local producer ([rdfs:isDefinedBy])
once again i'm lost :) where can i see datatourism data than you merge with osm ?
So what ref
tag to use?
@vinber it is generated from a query https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/analysers/analyser_merge_tourism_FR.py#L47 https://github.com/osm-fr/osmose-backend/blob/master/analysers/analyser_merge_tourism_FR.py#L70
good question, when we use it in Aquitaine, it was ref:FR:CRTA, but now with data tourism i don't know. I ask on mailing list ? ref:FR:tourism ?
But it is not a datatourisme ref. If it is just a copy of the local ref we may need to use the local ref key?
The adjustment of conflation distance double the number of Restaurant and Church.
But it is not a datatourisme ref. If it is just a copy of the local ref we may need to use the local ref key?
yes you're right
In datatourism, SIT (Système d'information touristique : local source) is define by hasBeenCreatedBy or hasBeenPublishedBy And ref is : isDefinedBy
and if there's no "possible_merge" but "only" missing_official it's because you have not time to do or for an other reason ?
and if there's no "possible_merge" but "only" missing_official it's because you have not time to do or for an other reason ?
We need a ref
I thought it was just for update_official
hasBeenCreatedBy
https://data.datatourisme.gouv.fr/864cf6ad-2809-39bf-a1aa-fbf3478cdf29
hasBeenPublishedBy
https://data.datatourisme.gouv.fr/7def446d-ec1e-327f-ba4e-262070d9785e
And ref is : isDefinedBy
For me the ref is under dc:identifier
, isDefinedBy
is aproperty of what?
Update query with ?creator_name and ?identifier https://annuel.framapad.org/p/dataljfjFKJQLKQLQ
page 9 https://framagit.org/datatourisme/ontology/-/blob/master/Documentation/Ontologie%20DATAtourisme%20v2.4_Documentation.pdf isDefinedBy : lorsque le concept est issu d’un thésaurus déjà existant. Renseigner ici l’identifiant unique du terme concerné.
But i'm not sure to understand what i read.
I suppose you're right : "La référence du POI dans le SIT source est dans la propriété dublin core identifier La référence unique du POI dans DATAtourisme est son URI"
https://support.datatourisme.gouv.fr/t/ref-du-sit-regional/1086/2
"concept" are the meta model, not the data, hasBeenCreatedBy or hasBeenPublishedBy are concept.
The issue is now that Osmose merge framework does not support variable tags key (but only variable value). We can filter data and run only on data from a source by area, or try to make support of variable key in the framework.
I change query to use ref (@nlehuby I switch the query to my own datatourism account) I map the ref from SIRTAQUI Nouvelle-Aquitaine" to ref:FR:CRTA, like disabled tourism query. @vinber I list the available provider at the end of https://annuel.framapad.org/p/dataljfjFKJQLKQLQ
Museum (TODO Aquitaine à supprimer) http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8010&class=350&useDevItem=all
Winery (TODO Aquitaine à supprimer) http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8250&class=360&useDevItem=all
Viewpoint http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8450&class=370&useDevItem=all
Picnic site http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8460&class=380&useDevItem=all
Camping http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8140&class=330
Church, few, probably only touristic ones (hidden item) http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8101&class=320&useDevItem=all
Restaurant http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?item=8240&class=340
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/fr/errors/?source=418164&item=xxxx&useDevItem=all
Major classes integrated and activated on frontend. Thank all.
cc @nlehuby @vinber Issue to improve datatourisme merge
First results with tourism_office http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?item=8420&useDevItem=all