Closed gileri closed 3 years ago
Argh. No. I just move out from template.
I plan to drop template support and even bottle.
So what approach would you suggest ? Rendering HTML by concatenating strings is not really enjoyable nor readable.
Maybe using lxml again and dump it as string into the xml.
Are the template OK before I rewrite them ? I'd like to avoid rewriting them thrice ;)
Content look ok for me. Be the layout have to be tested in readers.
lxml and string concatenations are now used render the XML descriptions. The feed is also now valid according to the W3C feed validator.
Before :
After :
@jocelynj what do think about the .pot update ?
@jocelynj what do think about the .pot update ?
The change seems fine. Could somebody check that running "make" keep the changes?
Could somebody check that running "make" keep the changes?
If that helps that's what I did to obtain those changes.
Thank you.
Deployed.
@gileri : I'm getting an issue when launching make here. Do I need to run npm before launching it?
% make
find: ../../web_api/views: No such file or directory
This PR does not change how the .pot is generated. On the the .pot file.
Fixes #155, #339