seasonal=spring/summer/autumn/winter (casting anything else than "seasonal=no" to "seasonal=yes" would already be an appreciated progress)
access:conditional=no @ ...
access:offroad= no
access:offroad:conditional= no @ ...
access:onroad= no
access:onroad:conditional= no @ ...
Thank you very much and best regards
Tell us about the expected behaviour (required)
The above mentioned objects complying to boundary=protected_area && protect_class=14 are often supplemented by conditional access rules as indicated by the requested tags. When the requested tags are implemented to the obf data, the respective polygons could be rendered differently and thus making the conditions easily visible to the reader.
Tell us about alternatives you've considered (required)
Alternatives are currently only maps available on the internet that already implemented the suggested rendering. Which is of course not possible on a hiking tour without network coverage.
Describe the idea (required)
Hello: After kindly implementing objects complying to boundary=protected_area && protect_class=14 to obf data, I would like to ask for the implementation of some further values to existing tags:
And some not yet implemented tags:
Thank you very much and best regards
Tell us about the expected behaviour (required)
The above mentioned objects complying to boundary=protected_area && protect_class=14 are often supplemented by conditional access rules as indicated by the requested tags. When the requested tags are implemented to the obf data, the respective polygons could be rendered differently and thus making the conditions easily visible to the reader.
Tell us about alternatives you've considered (required)
Alternatives are currently only maps available on the internet that already implemented the suggested rendering. Which is of course not possible on a hiking tour without network coverage.
Context (optional)
No response