Increase penalty of primary roads for pedestrian profile

[Guylby]

Routing engine

• [X] OsmAnd's in-app offline routing
• [X] Any online routing provider (YOURS, openrouteservice, OSRM, etc.)

Routing Profile

Osmand default pedestrian profile

Start and end points

Start=43.286500,6.133614 End=43.284459,6.136816

Actual route

When navigating between this two points with a pedestrian profile, Osmand offline routing makes you cross a primary road which is both dangerous and not ideal (there's a pedestrian underpass with just a small detour). I've checked the OSM data and there's no pedestrian crossings at this intersection. There is no signalisation saying pedestrians are not allowed. https://test.osmand.net/map/navigate/?start=43.286500,6.133614&end=43.284459,6.136816&profile=pedestrian#18/43.28562/6.13466

Expected route

With the same parameters, OSRM yields a safer and better itinerary, using the pedestrian underpass: https://map.project-osrm.org/?z=18&center=43.285447%2C6.135682&loc=43.286383%2C6.133767&loc=43.284442%2C6.136867&hl=en&alt=0&srv=2

Wouldn't it be better to increase the penalty of using primary roads to provide safer itineraries? Currently, other than creating a custom routing profile, there doesn't seem to be a way to discourages Osmand from using them.

Maps you used (online or offline)

• [X] Offline maps offered within the OsmAnd app for download. Latest map with Osmand Live updates.
• [ ] Online (tile / raster) maps

Your Environment

OsmAnd Version: 4.7.17
Android version: Android 13
Device model: Sony Xperia 10 III

Anything else?

No response

[vshcherb]

Seems tricky cause it doesn't start on footway