Route recalculation brings to the same point wanted to be avoided

max69dm commented 2 months ago

Description

Good morning I noticed that following a planned route that includes a piece on the highway, if I leave the route, the recalculation becomes absolutely inaccurate (it seems crazy that it traces trajectories in the middle of the gearboxes, incomprehensible "U" turns on ring roads, etc.), to return to the original route. Which does not happen if you set the destination with an address (recalculate the route correctly).

Steps to reproduce

I CAN'T PLAY IT, THE VIDEO IS VERY LARGE IN SIZE

Actual result

completely incorrect route recalculation

Expected result

That the route is recalculated correctly as in the case of a route where an address is indicated

Your Environment (required)

WARNING Crash-Logs MAY contain information you deem sensitive. Review this CAREFULLY before posting your issue!

OsmAnd Version:
Android/iOS version:
Device model:
Crash-Logs: ?

DmitryAlexei commented 2 months ago

Please provide information about your OsmAnd version? Do you use the latest release from GPlay? When navigating a track, do you use attach to the roads option? Please see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/gpx-navigation#attach-to-the-roads

max69dm commented 2 months ago

4.8.6

max69dm commented 2 months ago

I have also tried to plan a path that includes the highway, and if the navigator goes crazy from the route.The map revolves in all directions, the trace of the recalculation becomes straight to bring you back on the route and makes you pass through the buildings, fields, ditches etc.Do I have to change some setting?

vshcherb commented 2 months ago

Without track / screenshots / coordinates we wouldn't be able to help you.

max69dm commented 2 months ago

I attach videos and screenshots. When you deflect from a planned path, what you see happens. The map continues to turn, he says he did inversion in the middle of the road instead of at the first available point

DmitryAlexei commented 2 months ago

It is difficult to understand what is going on from screenshot. Probably routing proposes to turn left and go back to the route.

As mentioned above, to reproduce and fix wrong route recalculation, we need the initial .gpx file and also the recorded route.

max69dm commented 2 months ago

Forse ho capito cosa succede. Oggi faccio una prova e ci riaggiorniamo

Il Gio 15 Ago 2024, 10:44 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

It is difficult to understand what is going on from screenshot. Probably routing proposes to turn left and go back to the route.

As mentioned above, to reproduce and fix wrong route recalculation, we need the initial .gpx file and also the recorded route.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2290904090, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATTVVMD3FMHOGJNQIUDZRRS6VAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJQHEYDIMBZGA . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>

DmitryAlexei commented 2 months ago

@max69dm To better understand where to go, you can enable turn arrows in the Route line appearance menu see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/guidance/map-during-navigation/#turn-arrows

max69dm commented 2 months ago

Le frecce le ho inserite e mi trovo molto bene. Secondo me sbagliavo nel costruire un percorso che prevede il passaggio in autostrada. Mi spiego: se dall'ultimo punto del tragitto fino alla meta stabilita, faccio un unica traccia e l'ultimo punto è sotto i 5km rispetto al casello autostradale più vicino il navigatore inverte il tracciato è ti fa andare al casello che dicevo.....così facendo quando si riproduce il tracciato, al punto in questione l'applicazione va in tilt

Il Gio 15 Ago 2024, 12:30 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

@max69dm https://github.com/max69dm To better understand where to go, you can enable turn arrows in the Route line appearance menu see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/guidance/map-during-navigation/#turn-arrows

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2291039225, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATXV4JATNAV2B7KKJ3DZRR7MHAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJRGAZTSMRSGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

max69dm commented 2 months ago

Buongiorno Niente da fare, in un percorso pianificato che prevede l'autostrada, se si devia dal percorso prendendo una strada normale il navigatore non ricalcola assolutamente il nuovo tragitto. Mi capite bene che nel caso di deviazioni dovute a qualsiasi motivo, non si riesce più ad avete dati corretti. Non riesco ad inviare un video perché di dimensioni troppo grandi, l'unica cosa è che facciate voi la prova.

Il Gio 15 Ago 2024, 12:54 Massimo Dongilli @.***> ha scritto:

Le frecce le ho inserite e mi trovo molto bene. Secondo me sbagliavo nel costruire un percorso che prevede il passaggio in autostrada. Mi spiego: se dall'ultimo punto del tragitto fino alla meta stabilita, faccio un unica traccia e l'ultimo punto è sotto i 5km rispetto al casello autostradale più vicino il navigatore inverte il tracciato è ti fa andare al casello che dicevo.....così facendo quando si riproduce il tracciato, al punto in questione l'applicazione va in tilt

Il Gio 15 Ago 2024, 12:30 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

@max69dm https://github.com/max69dm To better understand where to go, you can enable turn arrows in the Route line appearance menu see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/guidance/map-during-navigation/#turn-arrows

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2291039225, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATXV4JATNAV2B7KKJ3DZRR7MHAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJRGAZTSMRSGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

DmitryAlexei commented 2 months ago

Please at least provide start/end coordinates and the place where you're starting to deviate from your route. You can use OsmAnd map to create a route https://osmand.net/map/navigate/ and paste it here (from address bar)

Please also make sure, that route recalculation option is enabled https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/guidance/navigation-settings#recalculate-route You can also disable tall roads in route parameters https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/routing/car-based-routing#route-parameters---car

max69dm commented 2 months ago

Uploading Screen_Recording_20240816_183136_OsmAnd.mp4…

DmitryAlexei commented 2 months ago

@max69dm Please just wait until the video is fully uploaded.

max69dm commented 2 months ago

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0d372f3f-72ab-40f4-a9e3-450ad93fad25

max69dm commented 2 months ago

max69dm commented 2 months ago

Good morning always about the recalculation of a new route in case of detours, I attach screenshots of what the navigator proposes in another example. At the top the original planned route, at the bottom the proposed recalculation. Question... what is the point of going back to the previous entrance to the ring road, when at the roundabout where there is the direction slider just go straight (indicated by the red arrow Via Mattarana) and enter the ring road at the next junction? I forward you the coordinates of the roundabout in question

max69dm commented 2 months ago

I tried in every way, nothing to do, the recalculation of a planned route completely went haywire. Please check.... I pay the subscription and I want a serious and efficient product. Menù--->Pianiifica un percorso--->Crea un nuovo percorso

DmitryAlexei commented 2 months ago

@max69dm Please clarify,

do you use navigation by track (see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/gpx-navigation) or point-to-point navigation (see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation)? It appears that point-to-point navigation may suit you better than track navigation (please see user guide https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation)
have you actually pressed "Start navigation" button? (on the video, routing seems not been active)
have you planned that route for navigation? https://osmand.net/map/navigate/?start=45.440531,11.042376&end=45.433575,11.061409&profile=car#15/45.4379/11.0502

Moreover, please refer to our guide about Plan-a-route tool https://osmand.net/docs/user/plan-route/create-route

max69dm commented 2 months ago

I will show you the video that illustrates how I build the route. Then Menu "My places--->click on the name of the track and start (in fact the navigation starts). Then if I deviate from the path everything goes haywire. If it's point to point or something I don't know, possibly tell me where I can see this. The version is 4.8.6. Let me know if the thing can be solved, otherwise I switch to another navigator..... too bad I have already paid the subscription until July 2025

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/661042aa-f2d1-4e85-a381-3e365ac038b2

max69dm commented 2 months ago

I go back to repeat that I perform the correcting procedure ..... I choose the trace and Facecio starts ...... the problem with the rical of the path at the case of division, although the function is essential.Come on Ditice this problem was born in the case of paths built or planned

max69dm commented 2 months ago

I did everything you told me in your last email, nothing to do. It's the same problem that was there months ago when in the routes chosen, by indicating a specific address or selecting the destination on the map, at every detour the recalculation went haywire. I assume it's the same problem

Il Sab 17 Ago 2024, 23:41 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

@max69dm https://github.com/max69dm Please clarify,

do you use navigation by track (see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/gpx-navigation) or point-to-point navigation (see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation)? It appears that point-to-point navigation may suit you better than track navigation (please see user guide https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation)

have you actually pressed "Start navigation" button? (on the video, routing seems not been active)

have you planned that route for navigation? https://osmand.net/map/navigate/?start=45.440531,11.042376&end=45.433575,11.061409&profile=car#15/45.4379/11.0502

Moreover, please refer to our guide about Plan-a-route tool https://osmand.net/docs/user/plan-route/create-route

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2294993145, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATRDGFTRAOLBNVSV2ZDZR67PHAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDEOJUHE4TGMJUGU . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

max69dm commented 2 months ago

Good morning.... Regarding this ticket, have you started to see what the problem is? I felt a disaster again today. Thank you

DmitryAlexei commented 1 month ago

@max69dm Please note that the main goal of route recalculation while using a track (your case) is to bring you back on that track. So you will be guided to the start or nearest point of the previously created track. And not to the final destination! I think, this is precisely what is happening to you. (Please see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/gpx-navigation#guidance)

If your main goal is to get to your destination point (and not to follow the entire track), we recommend using direct navigation. To start that type of navigation, long tap on your destination on the map > navigation > start. (For more information, see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation)

Please try direct navigation and see if the “strange” recalculation persists.

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Hi Dimitri if I understand correctly, in a route built via Menu>Plan route>Build route, in case of deviation, priority is given to the closest point or even to the departure. However, I don't understand the usefulness and I'll give you an example

Departure point A Work in progress point B so I'm forced to deviate at this point it sends me to the closest point or even to the departure...but then I continue to go back and forth between A and B. Isn't it more logical to give importance to the destination regardless of the recalculated route?

For the other solution, I confirm that the recalculation works, but if I use this solution I no longer have the possibility of building the route so the usefulness of this function would cease

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Dimitri I just can't understand what difference there is between the recalculation due to any deviation from a route calculated by the navigator, and a recalculation with respect to a planned route..... in the first case it is perfect, it always brings you back on the route as soon as possible but always in the direction of travel, while in the second it makes you return to the nearest point by reversing the direction even by six / seven km. I only ask that you do the same type of recalculation in the case of a planned route, that is, that it takes you back to the original route but that it takes place in the direction of travel

Il Lun 2 Set 2024, 23:16 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

@max69dm https://github.com/max69dm Please note that the main goal of route recalculation while using a track (your case) is to bring you back on that track. So you will be guided to the start or nearest point of the previously created track. And not to the final destination! I think, this is precisely what is happening to you. (Please see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/gpx-navigation#guidance)

If your main goal is to get to your destination point (and not to follow the entire track), we recommend using direct navigation. To start that type of navigation, long tap on your destination on the map > navigation > start. (For more information, see https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation)

Please try direct navigation and see if the “strange” recalculation persists.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2325307112, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATRN5JGKYKZCO7GLLK3ZUTIRNAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMRVGMYDOMJRGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

DmitryAlexei commented 1 month ago

Please note that navigation by track and direct-to-point navigation are designed for different purposes.

Navigation by track is mostly used for outdoor activities such as hiking, cycling, off-road driving etc. It is assumed that your goal is to complete the entire route. Previously, navigation by track was also helpful for driving on a long distance, since route calculation took a lot of time (now, thanks to the new HH routing algorithm, navigation has become much faster).
Direct-to-point navigation is used to navigate directly to a specific location without following a predetermined route.

Please note, that if you need specific stops on the way to your final destination, you can use intermediate destinations with direct-to-point navigation https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation#intermediate-destinations

Could you describe your use case so that we can help you better?

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Domani ti mando tutti i dettagli

Il Mer 4 Set 2024, 20:04 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

Please note that navigation by track and direct-to-point navigation are designed for different purposes.

Navigation by track is mostly used for outdoor activities such as hiking, cycling, off-road driving etc. Previously, it was also helpful for driving on a long distance, since route calculation took a lot of time (now, thanks to the new HH routing algorithm, navigation has become much faster).

Direct-to-point navigation is used to navigate directly to a specific location without following a predetermined route.

Please note, that if you need specific stops on the way to your final destination, you can use intermediate destinations with direct-to-point navigation https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation#intermediate-destinations

Could you describe your use case so that we can help you better?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2329679002, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATSHZLBZMDQ3IBGJGFLZU5DUPAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMRZGY3TSMBQGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Hi Dimitri I tried to choose the destination by long pressing on the map and inserting various intermediate points, but the result does not change the navigator crashes when recalculating. I would like to point out that this problem existed until a few months ago even when you chose a point on the map or typed the address...you have fixed everything and it works perfectly. I am attaching the word file with the directions of the proposed route (black arrows) and the one I do (green arrow). From where you see the green arrow for recalculation it sends me back to the starting point...frankly I am more and more convinced that there is something wrong perhaps in the new algorithm. The route is home---work. I'll send you all the coordinates Start 45.457077,11.062313 Intermediate point 45.414098,11.123877 Third exit roundabout to follow second black arrow 45.407892,11.143683 Work 45.408698,11.240376. Other examples of the same problem can be found on GitHub ticket 20594

Il Mer 4 Set 2024, 20:04 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

Please note that navigation by track and direct-to-point navigation are designed for different purposes.

Navigation by track is mostly used for outdoor activities such as hiking, cycling, off-road driving etc. Previously, it was also helpful for driving on a long distance, since route calculation took a lot of time (now, thanks to the new HH routing algorithm, navigation has become much faster).

Direct-to-point navigation is used to navigate directly to a specific location without following a predetermined route.

Please note, that if you need specific stops on the way to your final destination, you can use intermediate destinations with direct-to-point navigation https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/setup/route-navigation#intermediate-destinations

Could you describe your use case so that we can help you better?

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2329679002, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATSHZLBZMDQ3IBGJGFLZU5DUPAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMRZGY3TSMBQGI . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

DmitryAlexei commented 1 month ago

Is that route correct? https://osmand.net/map/navigate/?start=45.457065,11.062320&end=45.408619,11.240419&via=45.414080,11.123936;45.408744,11.143414&profile=car#14/45.4255/11.1255 You mentioned Word file, but I don't see it. It appears that files should be attached to messages directly, GitHub doesn't support attaching via email.

Route recalculation options can be also changed in Menu → Navigation → Settings → Navigation settings https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/guidance/navigation-settings#recalculate-route

Could you please also provide crash logs: Menu → Help → Send crash log ?

DmitryAlexei commented 1 month ago

max69dm commented 1 month ago

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Ciao Su GitHub ho allegato il file Pdf con le frecce che ti dicevo nella precedente mail. Il percorso che hai ricostruito è perfetto e corrisponde a quello da me pianificato. Si il ticket 19737 fa riferimento a questo problema come il 20594. A suo tempo anche se sceglievo la destinazione sulla mappa o indicavo l'indirizzo, se c'era una deviazione il navigatore andava il tilt. Il problema poi lo avete perfettamente risolto. Questa mattina andando al lavoro, alla rotonda dopo il segnaposto 2 mi diceva di tornare a casa quindi di circa 9km indietro......altre volte per andare a Vicenza e prevedo l'autostrada, appositamente evito il casello autostradale di Verona est....il ricalcolo mi dice di andare a Verona sud per ritornare verso Vicenza, quando è logico entrare al casello di Soave in provincia di Verona ovviamente in direzione di Vicenza. Se si fanno le deviazioni è perché ci sono problemi sul percorso che devono essere evitati. Se hai bisogno di altro sono qui Grazie

Il Gio 5 Set 2024, 13:20 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

Probably related

19737 https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/19737

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2331265964, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATXVD6TW3U7OHPX5KNLZVA5ABAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMZRGI3DKOJWGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Hi Dimitri

If you can answer me, can the problem of recalculating the route on planned routes be solved?

Il Gio 5 Set 2024, 13:41 Massimo Dongilli @.***> ha scritto:

Ciao Su GitHub ho allegato il file Pdf con le frecce che ti dicevo nella precedente mail. Il percorso che hai ricostruito è perfetto e corrisponde a quello da me pianificato. Si il ticket 19737 fa riferimento a questo problema come il 20594. A suo tempo anche se sceglievo la destinazione sulla mappa o indicavo l'indirizzo, se c'era una deviazione il navigatore andava il tilt. Il problema poi lo avete perfettamente risolto. Questa mattina andando al lavoro, alla rotonda dopo il segnaposto 2 mi diceva di tornare a casa quindi di circa 9km indietro......altre volte per andare a Vicenza e prevedo l'autostrada, appositamente evito il casello autostradale di Verona est....il ricalcolo mi dice di andare a Verona sud per ritornare verso Vicenza, quando è logico entrare al casello di Soave in provincia di Verona ovviamente in direzione di Vicenza. Se si fanno le deviazioni è perché ci sono problemi sul percorso che devono essere evitati. Se hai bisogno di altro sono qui Grazie

Il Gio 5 Set 2024, 13:20 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

Probably related

19737 https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/19737

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2331265964, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATXVD6TW3U7OHPX5KNLZVA5ABAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMZRGI3DKOJWGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

DmitryAlexei commented 1 month ago

If your main goal is to avoid toll road, it is proposed to enable "avoid toll roads" option in Menu → Settings → App profiles → Navigation settings → Route parameters https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/routing/car-based-routing

As for the route recalculation. I didn't find any issue in recalculation when simulating deviation from your route. It worked as expected: the nearest point of a track or intermediate destination were proposed to continue the trip.

Probably I cannot catch your point, or the problem only occurs under certain conditions.

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Dopo ti preparo lo screenshot del percorso, e lo screen screenshot di quello che ricalcola per riportarmi sul percorso dopo una deviazione

Il Sab 7 Set 2024, 02:12 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

If your main goal is to avoid toll road, it is proposed to enable "avoid toll roads" option in Menu → Settings → App profiles → Navigation settings → Route parameters https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/routing/car-based-routing

As for the route recalculation. I didn't find any issue in recalculation when simulating deviation from your route. It worked as expected: the nearest point of a track or intermediate destination were proposed to continue the trip.

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80fa96bc-f552-4492-a3b8-6efaa8db269e

Probably I cannot catch your point, or the problem only occurs under certain conditions.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2334958068, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATVCTQ33PDHM7ZV4XDLZVJAGFAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMZUHE2TQMBWHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

max69dm commented 1 month ago

For point 1, excuse me but what's the point of deactivating the motorway..... then What is automatic recalculation for? Any navigator has no problem recalculating a route automatically (starting with Waze)

I am attaching two screenshots, the first with the route I created, where the red arrows are the route, while the green one is the detour. Now I understand that the type of recalculation is performed.... it takes you back to the point of the route closest to the detour made by making you go back and forth which is useless. I show you the coordinates of the detour, of the point where it takes you back and then take you back to the original route. Forgive me but it certainly makes more sense that the recalculation takes you to your destination even by taking a different route and this is true by car, than by bicycle

Start of deviation coordinates 45.453822,11.057493 (Start of green arrow)

Recalculation of the correct direction to coordinates 45.448203,11.037251

Navigator recalculation takes you back to point 3 of the route coordinates 45.441862,11.061266 (what's the point?.......).

Now I ask you if you can do something well, otherwise I let the navigator calculate everything but then you ask me what is the use of having the "Plan route" function? If nothing can be done, I cancel the subscription and do not renew it in 2025.....reviews obviously very low

Il Sab 7 Set 2024, 02:12 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

If your main goal is to avoid toll road, it is proposed to enable "avoid toll roads" option in Menu → Settings → App profiles → Navigation settings → Route parameters https://osmand.net/docs/user/navigation/routing/car-based-routing

As for the route recalculation. I didn't find any issue in recalculation when simulating deviation from your route. It worked as expected: the nearest point of a track or intermediate destination were proposed to continue the trip.

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/80fa96bc-f552-4492-a3b8-6efaa8db269e

Probably I cannot catch your point, or the problem only occurs under certain conditions.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2334958068, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATVCTQ33PDHM7ZV4XDLZVJAGFAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGMZUHE2TQMBWHA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

vshcherb commented 1 month ago

@max69dm let's clarify it regardless paid subscription or not, as Github serves the purpose to improve the product overall and not to find solution for 1 customer.

Users are not supposed to change the route in general. If it happens, either proposed route is wrong or situation has changed immediately. 1.1 If you know you doon't like the route, use route parameters like "Avoid toll roads" or Intermediate points to not go the route you don't want. We also can discuss details but that would be routing issue.
If route recalculation needs to happen it happens with delay typically 5-10 seconds to veriy that you are OFF the route and that's not a GPS-error 2.1 If you don't like that delay you can make it smaller in settings, but then with GPS-errors it's possible to see more often route recalculations.
Route recalculation doesn't mean it won't bring you to the same point you wanted to avoid. 3.1 Full route recalculation happens on 3rd recalculation, so if you definitely don't want to use 1 road, you need to use Avoid Road functionality.

Summary, if you don't want to go the route the navigator build, it's better not to use navigation cause it probably won't change navigation on go as you want

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Hello ..... that I put "avoid tinging" or not, in the case of a path built by me and not calculated by the navigator, forgive me if I insist but the recalculation must take place automatically .... if I build a path It's because I'm sure I like it. An example: if I plan a route from Verona to Florence that includes the highway and in Bologna I find an accident and I am forced to leave the highway, I think it is more than legitimate to demand the recalculation by the navigator automatically that you report on the route Not where there is the accident but certainly later in the direction of Florence thus avoiding the problem of the accident which takes place perfectly in the case of a path calculated by the navigator. This does not happen because it brings you back exactly where there is the problem. This recalculation takes place quietly with the completely free locus map application. If you ask me why I don't go to this application I answer you immediately: 1) There are no 3D maps 2) does not support the mouse maps 3) the progress of the cursor and the rotation of the map are not fluid 4) The update of the maps compared to Opensreetmap.org does not take place immediately but after a few days Mine always remains the intention of giving suggestions for improving the application. For the other ticket, that is, the rotation of the map very early compared to the crossings, I hope you can solve it ..... you are wrong the tickets for tickets 20422.

Il Ven 13 Set 2024, 16:47 vshcherb @.***> ha scritto:

@max69dm https://github.com/max69dm let's clarify it regardless paid subscription or not, as Github serves the purpose to improve the product overall and not to find solution for 1 customer.

Users are not supposed to change the route in general. If it happens, either proposed route is wrong or situation has changed immediately. 1.1 If you know you doon't like the route, use route parameters like "Avoid toll roads" or Intermediate points to not go the route you don't want. We also can discuss details but that would be routing issue.

If route recalculation needs to happen it happens with delay typically 5-10 seconds to veriy that you are OFF the route and that's not a GPS-error 2.1 If you don't like that delay you can make it smaller in settings, but then with GPS-errors it's possible to see more often route recalculations.

Route recalculation doesn't mean it won't bring you to the same point you wanted to avoid. 3.1 Full route recalculation happens on 3rd recalculation, so if you definitely don't want to use 1 road, you need to use Avoid Road functionality.

Summary, if you don't want to go the route the navigator build, it's better not to use navigation cause it probably won't change navigation on go as you want

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2349135239, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATS5NYULSMTORFF3KTLZWL3H7AVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNBZGEZTKMRTHE . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

vshcherb commented 1 month ago

@max69dm If you didn't try to change the Recalculate route in case of deviation from 50m -> 10m. Then we simply can't communicate and we need to close that ticket as non-reproducible.

I double checked your video (the only playable here I think) - https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2294333526

2 recalculations happened within max 8-10 seconds after you left the route
If we count this configurable threshold of 50 m, then recalculation took max 2-3 seconds.

Again I didn't find anything subjectively inappropriate from your videos and from your messages it's hard to understand what do you try to achieve.

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Provo a mettere 10mt per il ricalcolo. Faccio l'ultimo tentativo per farmi capire allegando lo screenshot. La freccia rossa indica quello che deve essere il ricalcolo corretto. Le note scritte all'interno dei quadrati vi chiedo la cortesia di tradurle. Il ricalcolo corretto è in direzione dritta rispetto alla punta del cursore.

Il Sab 14 Set 2024, 13:56 vshcherb @.***> ha scritto:

@max69dm https://github.com/max69dm If you didn't try to change the Recalculate route in case of deviation from 50m -> 10m. Then we simply can't communicate and we need to close that ticket as non-reproducible.

I double checked your video (the only playable here I think) - #20594 (comment) https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2294333526

2 recalculations happened within max 8-10 seconds after you left the route

If we count this configurable threshold of 50 m, then recalculation took max 2-3 seconds.

Again I didn't find anything subjectively inappropriate from your videos and from your messages it's hard to understand what do you try to achieve.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2350965014, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATSFIGD3SZ2HWEFCXDLZWQP6RAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNJQHE3DKMBRGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Scusate avete chiuso il mio ticket 20594? Tanto per sapere Grazie

Il Lun 16 Set 2024, 18:18 Massimo Dongilli @.***> ha scritto:

Good morning I'll make one last attempt to explain to you what I would like the navigator to do in the case of a constructed and not calculated route. Yesterday I built a route that started at coordinates 45.433833,10.908182, crossed the T4-T9 ring road starting at coordinates 45.432181,10.916132 and ending at coordinates 45.432181,10.979716, then crossed the center of Verona and then ended at coordinates 45.458037,11.063530. I found the T4-T9 ring road completely closed at the beginning so I was forced to take the southern ring road. Result the navigator made me exit at coordinates 45.400550,10.944075 to return to the beginning of the closed ring road, while continuing straight, subsequently it made me exit at coordinates 45.397337,10.967346 always with the same indication, and again at coordinates 45.409538,11.087249 making me go back 9km always to the closed ring road, when in reality from coordinates 45.409538,11.087249 it was enough to make me go to coordinates 45.418658,11.080300 to reach my destination. Now I ask you if something like this happens to you, how do you behave...would you like it? I understand that apparently I am the only user who has this problem, but at least I ask you if it is possible to add in the parameters of the route recalculation, the option that provides for giving priority to reaching the destination, even if the recalculated route is different from the one planned by the user, also maintaining the one that is currently planned. Thanks I attach video of how you try to recalculate something

Il Sab 14 Set 2024, 13:56 vshcherb @.***> ha scritto:

@max69dm https://github.com/max69dm If you didn't try to change the Recalculate route in case of deviation from 50m -> 10m. Then we simply can't communicate and we need to close that ticket as non-reproducible.

I double checked your video (the only playable here I think) - #20594 (comment) https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2294333526

2 recalculations happened within max 8-10 seconds after you left the route

If we count this configurable threshold of 50 m, then recalculation took max 2-3 seconds.

Again I didn't find anything subjectively inappropriate from your videos and from your messages it's hard to understand what do you try to achieve.

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2350965014, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATSFIGD3SZ2HWEFCXDLZWQP6RAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNJQHE3DKMBRGQ . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

DmitryAlexei commented 1 month ago

The issue is still open. There are no photos or videos attached to your latest messages

max69dm commented 1 month ago

Ciao Lunedì ti mando la videata di cosa voglio spiegare, tutte le coordinate e ciò che fa osmand....ti allego qui la videata o su GitHub?

Il Gio 26 Set 2024, 13:56 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

The issue is still open. There are no photos or videos attached to your latest messages

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2376731670, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATSGJRMR7SGT27ZEGDDZYPY6XAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNZWG4ZTCNRXGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

max69dm commented 1 month ago

HI I am attaching the video of how the navigator involves. The journey created by me (not calculated by the navigator is the blue one) .... Details 1) Departure coordinates 45.457079.11.062292 2) All via del Vegron Coordinates 45.448851.11.058823 3) All via Mattarana Coordinates 45.440026,11.051628 4) All via Banchette Coordinate 45.400910,11.037848 5) All via Girolamo from the Coordinate Court 45.443901.11.027758 6) All via d'Arezzo coordinate 45.447340.11.027080 7) All via San Felice Coordinate 45.448224,11.028075 8) Final destination via Zagata Coordinates 45.448895.11.027446 As can be seen from the video I start to change the path to the coordinates 45.453815.11.057457 ..... I expect that to bring me to the route to pass me from via San Michele Coordinate 45.450656.11.047545, if I still go ahead via via Montelungo Coordinate 45.448176.11.037254. Instead the navigator makes me pass from via San Michele, to go back to via Mattarana, still behind via del Vegron, again via Mattarana and then via Banchette in my opinion wrong. What I would like to do, it is obviously to bring the user back to the route, but at the first point in correspondence with the GPS position always in the direction of travel.

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8173d7b1-0680-4ebd-9488-aeb2982f14e4

max69dm commented 1 month ago

I put both the description drl route and the video on GitHub ticket 20594

Il Gio 26 Set 2024, 13:56 DmitryAlexei @.***> ha scritto:

The issue is still open. There are no photos or videos attached to your latest messages

— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/osmandapp/OsmAnd/issues/20594#issuecomment-2376731670, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BC2VATSGJRMR7SGT27ZEGDDZYPY6XAVCNFSM6AAAAABMOI6KKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNZWG4ZTCNRXGA . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: @.***>

vshcherb commented 2 weeks ago

Thanks for update, will reinvestigate it

osmandapp / OsmAnd