grrla
commented
9 hours ago Parks and Recreation seems more plausible Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 28, 2024, at 13:19, Snowysauce @.***> wrote:
What should the name of the operator be? https://london.ca/living-london/parks-facilities/parks/parks-london refers to "Parks and Recreation", but https://london.ca/government/council-civic-administration/committees-task-forces/standing-committees lists the "Community and Protective Services Committee" as being in charge of "Parks, recreation and neighbourhood services".
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/osmlab/name-suggestion-index/issues/9414#issuecomment-2380839393, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/BH6SZPD3AGIRIFSZV3VDJJ3ZY3QJDAVCNFSM6AAAAABHACARNSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGOBQHAZTSMZZGM. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
What should the name of the operator be? https://london.ca/living-london/parks-facilities/parks/parks-london refers to "Parks and Recreation", but https://london.ca/government/council-civic-administration/committees-task-forces/standing-committees lists the "Community and Protective Services Committee" as being in charge of "Parks, recreation and neighbourhood services".